Posted in National Catholic News, on January 30th, 2012

Catholic voters urged to press US government to rescind HHS mandate

By Andy Telli
Catholic News Service

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (CNS) — It will be up to Catholic voters to convince the federal government to rescind a recent decision by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to go forward with a mandate that all health insurance plans cover contraceptives and sterilization free of charge, said Archbishop Charles J. Chaput.

“Bishops can’t tell politicians what to do, but Catholic voters can,” the Archbishop said during a visit to Nashville. Political leaders respond to pressure from citizens, he added, and Catholics ought to demand respect for religious values.

Archbishop Chaput joined fellow bishops in urging Catholics in the pew to be more politically active.

“The very principle of religious freedom, the first freedom in the Bill of Rights, is at stake here,” he said. “That’s a lot to be at stake. Once it’s lost, you don’t get it back.”

The archbishop celebrated a Mass of investiture at Nashville’s Cathedral of the Incarnation Jan. 26 for Dominican Sister Mary Sarah Galbraith as the new president of Aquinas College, which is owned and operated by the Dominican Sisters of St. Cecilia Congregation. At the Mass, she was formally installed in the post she has held since last summer.

The Mass was on the feast day of St. Thomas Aquinas, the college’s namesake. Archbishop Chaput celebrated it for Nashville Bishop David R. Choby, who was in Rome. He was among the bishops from Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama and Kentucky making their “ad limina” visits to report on the status of their dioceses to the Pope and Vatican officials.

The Philadelphia archbishop knew Sister Mary Sarah from Denver, when he was archbishop there and she was a teacher at a parish school there at the time.

In an interview with the Tennessee Register, Nashville’s diocesan newspaper, Archbishop Chaput addressed the contraceptive mandate and the Jan. 20 announcement by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that religious organizations could delay but not opt out of the required coverage and that the religious exemption as first released would go into effect unchanged.

Catholic and other religious leaders have objected that the exemption is written so narrowly that institutions such as hospitals, schools and social service agencies would not qualify.

The mandate and the narrow exemption are examples of society’s growing indifference to religious values, the archbishop said.

Society’s hostility to faith and religion comes “from a secularized people who don’t see the importance of respecting the moral values of other people if those values stand in the way of their goals,” he said.

Bishops across the U.S. condemned the HHS regulations when they were first proposed and worked to persuade federal officials to change them and to broaden the religious exemption. They have been forceful in their condemnations of the latest announcement as well.

“The bishops as a body are very committed to taking a firm stance on this,” as evidenced by the establishment of the new Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, Archbishop Chaput said.

Because the Church did not work harder to combat indifference to religious values in society earlier, “now it’s come back to bite us in the face,” he said.

The regulations leave Catholic institutions with few options.

One option would be to stop offering health insurance as an employee benefit, Archbishop Chaput said. Catholic institutions presumably would increase employees’ pay so they could buy insurance on their own, he said, but that would mean their health insurance premiums would most likely be more expensive.

“Or we can stop helping people who aren’t Catholic, but Catholics always take care of other people,” Archbishop Chaput said. “The church has to live in the broader world or else it’s not living its values.”

Catholic leaders might be forced to choose the option of civil disobedience, Archbishop Chaput said. Catholics are good citizens, he said, “but we’re God’s citizens first.”

The best outcome would be for public pressure to force the government to change the contraceptive mandate, Archbishop Chaput said.

The arguments supporting it say it promotes women’s health, but Archbishop Chaput said the issue isn’t one of women’s rights. The Catholic Church is a great supporter of women’s rights, he said, “but not at the point of giving up our basic values.”

For Aquinas College, the archbishop will serve on a new Presidential Advisory Council, which includes clergy and laypeople.

Other members include: Archbishops Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Ky., Jose H. Gomez of Los Angeles and Archbishop Paul S. Coakley of Oklahoma City; Bishop Robert F. Vasa of Santa Rosa, Calif., and Bishop Choby; Auxiliary Bishop James D. Conley of Denver; Basilian Father Thomas Rosica, CEO of Salt and Light Television in Toronto; Curtis Martin, founder and president, Fellowship of Catholic University Students; and William Burleigh, former chief executive officer of Scripps Howard.

Aquinas College, founded in 1961, has about 750 students studying in its liberal arts, business administration, teacher education and nursing programs.

---

---

4 Responses

1. The answer may well be that the Church should offer two types of health insurance options:

   (1) for Catholic employees, it could offer insurance coverage in a way that is consistent with the Church’s teachings; and

   (2) for non-Catholic employees, it could provide a stipend which could be used by those employees to buy insurance coverage of their choice.

   By: Robert on January 31, 2012 at 9:56 am

   Reply

2. @ Robert: you would still be forcing the Catholic Church, subsidized by all contributing Catholics, to be paying for something Catholics faithful to the Catechism view as immoral. It’s like saying “You want an abortion? Oh, well I’m against it but here’s a thousand dollars… Do what you want with it.”

   By: Michele on January 31, 2012 at 12:45 pm

   Reply

3. Thank you Archbishop Chaput for your courage and clear teaching as our shepherd.

   By: Fr. Joe Coffey on February 11, 2012 at 11:51 pm

   Reply

4. It’s frequently been observed that politics makes for strange bedfellows. More specifically, the Obama White House adopts the philosophy stated by Justice Antonin Scalia writing for himself and six other justices in the US Supreme Court’s 1990 decision Smith v Oregon.
   Strangely and conversely, the American Catholic bishops adopt the philosophy of the ACLU in the 1993 Act of Congress entitled the “Religious Rights Restoration Act” where the Senate rejected 97 to 3 the philosophy stated three years earlier by Scalia in the Smith decision.
   Go figure.

   By: John Day on February 17, 2012 at 2:20 pm

   Reply