Two archbishops, including Archbishop Charles Chaput, expressed their disappointment over President Donald Trump’s decision Jan. 31 to retain President Barack Obama’s 2014 directive that prohibits federal government contractors from sexual orientation, which it does not define, and gender identity discrimination.
That executive order, 13672, also forbids gender identity discrimination in the employment of federal workers.
In addition to Archbishop Chaput, who is chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishop’s Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth, Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore, chairman of the conference’s Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, issued a joint statement Feb. 1.
They called the Trump administration’s decision not to rescind Obama’s order “troubling and disappointing,” and “deeply flawed.”
“The church steadfastly opposes all unjust discrimination, and we need to continue to advance justice and fairness in the workplace,” they wrote. The executive order, however, “creates problems rather than solves them. In seeking to remedy instances of discrimination, it creates new forms of discrimination against people of faith. Keeping the Executive Order intact is not the answer.”
“We hope that the administration will be open to continued conversations to find ways to advance the cause of justice and respect the conscience rights of all people,” the bishops wrote.
In 2014 two bishops who headed the same committees of the bishops’ conference, Bishop Richard J. Malone of Buffalo and Archbishop Lori, called for opposition to Obama’s order, which they called “unprecedented and extreme.”
The order “lends the economic power of the federal government to a deeply flawed understanding of human sexuality, to which faithful Catholics and many other people of faith will not assent. As a result, the order will exclude federal contractors precisely on the basis of their religious beliefs,” they wrote.
The bishops called the order “an anomaly” because it contained no religious liberty protections for religious employers. “In this way, the order, which is fundamentally flawed in itself, also needlessly prefers conflict and exclusion over coexistence and cooperation,” they wrote.
Join the CatholicPhilly.com family
CatholicPhilly.com works to strengthen the connections between people, families and communities every day by delivering the news people need to know about the Catholic Church, especially in the Philadelphia region, and the world in which we live.
By your donation in any amount, you and hundreds of other people become part of our mission to inform, form in the Catholic faith and inspire the thousands of readers who visit every month.
Here is how you can help:
- A $100 gift allows us to present award-winning photos of Catholic life in our neighborhoods.
- A $50 gift enables us to cover a news event in a local parish, school or Catholic institution.
- A $20 gift lets us obtain solid faith formation resources that can deepen your spirituality and knowledge of the faith.
- A small, automated monthly donation means you can support us continually and easily.
Won't you consider making a gift today?
Please join in the church's vital mission of communications by offering a gift in whatever amount that you can ― a single gift of $40, $50, $100, or more, or a monthly donation. Your gift will strengthen the fabric of our entire Catholic community and sustain CatholicPhilly.com as your trusted news source. Thank you in advance!
Make your donation by credit card here:
Or make your donation by check:
222 N. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
PREVIOUS: Catholic news vital for forming adults who will lead the church, speaker says
NEXT: Delaware County priests, young adults open up about their lives
Oh yes, clearly, this tiny population of what is probably the most oppressed class of people per capita worldwide (for 5-18 y/o less than .05%) is discriminating against Christian Americans (70%). I am curious how this small minority oppresses the majority? I recall the whites claimed the blacks were oppressing them during desegregation, in fact I seem to remember that is a current claim as well.
Percentages have nothing to do with it; influence does. Or, would you like to say that governments have never oppressed people, because government officials are only a small percentage of the overall population, and so are incapable of doing so? People shouldn’t be forced to capitulate to something they find immoral just cos someone else wants them to.