My column this week is a collection of personal comments. Read it as thoughts from a brother in the faith, not as teachings from an archbishop.
Presidential campaigns typically hit full stride after Labor Day in an election year. But 2016 is a year in which two prominent Catholics – a sitting vice president, and the next vice presidential nominee of his party — both seem to publicly ignore or invent the content of their Catholic faith as they go along. And meanwhile, both candidates for the nation’s top residence, the White House, have astonishing flaws.
This is depressing and liberating at the same time. Depressing, because it’s proof of how polarized the nation has become. Liberating, because for the honest voter, it’s much easier this year to ignore the routine tribal loyalty chants of both the Democratic and Republican camps. I’ve been a registered independent for a long time and never more happily so than in this election season. Both major candidates are – what’s the right word? so problematic – that neither is clearly better than the other.
As Forbes magazine pointed out some months ago, the Republican candidate is worth roughly $4.5 billion. The Democratic candidate is worth roughly $45 million. Compare that with the average American household, which is worth about $144,000. The median U.S. income is about $56,000. Neither major candidate lives anywhere near the solar system where most Americans live, work and raise families. Nonetheless, we’re asked to trust them.
[hotblock]
That’s a big ask. One candidate — in the view of a lot of people — is an eccentric businessman of defective ethics whose bombast and buffoonery make him inconceivable as president. And the other – in the view of a lot of people – should be under criminal indictment. The fact that she’s not – again, in the view of a lot of people — proves Orwell’s Animal Farm principle that “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
So what are we to do this election cycle as Catholic voters? Note that by “Catholic,” I mean people who take their faith seriously; people who actually believe what the Catholic faith holds to be true; people who place it first in their loyalty, thoughts and actions; people who submit their lives to Jesus Christ, to Scripture and to the guidance of the community of belief we know as the Church.
Anyone else who claims the Catholic label is simply fooling himself or herself — and even more importantly, misleading others.
The American bishops offer valuable counsel in their document Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (available from the USCCB), and this year especially, they ask us to pray before we vote. This is hardly new “news.” Prayer is always important. In a year when each Catholic voter must choose between deeply flawed options, prayer is essential. And prayer involves more than mumbling a Hail Mary before we pull the voting booth lever for someone we see as the lesser of two evils. Prayer is a conversation, an engagement of the soul with God. It involves listening for God’s voice and educating our consciences.
It’s absurd – in fact, it’s blasphemous – to assume that God prefers any political party in any election year. But God, by his nature, is always concerned with good and evil and the choices we make between the two. For Catholics, no political or social issue stands in isolation. But neither are all pressing issues equal in foundational importance or gravity. The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.
[hotblock2]
God created us with good brains. It follows that he will hold us accountable to think deeply and clearly, rightly ordering the factors that guide us, before we act politically. And yet modern American life, from its pervasive social media that too often resemble a mobocracy, to the relentless catechesis of consumption on our TVs, seems designed to do the opposite. It seems bent on turning us into opinionated and distracted cattle unable to gain mastery over our own appetites and thoughts. Thinking and praying require silence, and the only way we can get silence is by deciding to step back and unplug.
This year, a lot of good people will skip voting for president but vote for the “down ticket” names on their party’s ballot; or vote for a third party presidential candidate; or not vote at all; or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates. I don’t yet know which course I’ll personally choose. It’s a matter properly reserved for every citizen’s informed conscience.
But I do know a few of the things I’ll be reading between now and November. The list is not exclusive or comprehensive. But this year these particular titles seem especially urgent:
- Living the Gospel of Life. This 1998 pastoral letter of the U.S. bishops remains the best brief guide to American Catholic political reflection yet produced.
- Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society by R.R. Reno (Regnery) and It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies by Mary Eberstadt (HarperCollins). Both of these books are new, important, a key to understanding the current moment in our national life, and deeply engaging. They need to be discussed and shared widely.
- And finally two essays by the late, great Czech writer, Václav Havel, “Politics and Conscience” and “The Power of the Powerless.” Both are collected in Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 (Vintage Books). Havel was not (to my knowledge) a religious believer, and he wrote as a dissident during an era of Soviet Bloc repression. But his commitment to what he called “living in the truth,” and his understanding and critique of the weaknesses in Western societies like our own – not just Marxist ones – were remarkable. They remain relevant right now, today.
The next few months will determine the next decade and more of our nation’s life. We need to be awake, we need to clear our heads of media noise, and we need to think quietly and carefully before we vote. None of us can afford to live the coming weeks on autopilot.
PREVIOUS: The Court, the House, and the elections ahead
NEXT: Some additional thoughts — and the elephant in the room
Thank you so much for this. Thank you for your clarity. It is a consolation to us who need your leadership. God bless you and know you are in my prayers.
Hello. Although I am not Catholic, I am a brother in Christ. I’ve been following your ministry since Rapid City because my Mom’s family is from South Dakota. I wanted to thank you for speaking the TRUTH. There is only one source for this ability and that is our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Hearing the truth proclaimed brings peace to those who believe!! I will continue to pray that God gives you strength and joy!! God bless. Eric Norby
I will read the books or try. But I am strongly Pro Life. When I was in Viet Nam we refered to the Big Cahoona (God). I think often of this in what I did and did not due. I am a Marine and pray for God.s forgiveness. Love Paul
I wonder if we read the same article. Your Emminence Archbishop Chaput gave us his misgivings about this year’s election, some reading selections to enlighten ourselves as to the changes which are occurring globally, and to pray. As I see it, as Catholics, we have a choice between someone we can’t vote for and someone we don’t want to vote for. I plan to follow Archbishop Chaput advice and pray for wisdom and for this country of ours in this difficult and crocial time.
The comments, which began streaming on this post almost as soon as it was published, are a disheartening view of Catholicism today. Unfortunately, you were all in such a hurry to write a rebuttal to arguably the most solid, Catholic, intelligent Archbishops of the day, you skipped right over his advice.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput. I could not vote for Trump because I do not believe him. He changes his stance on Abortion and I do not believe he is authentic in anything but Selfishness. He has made a fool of every conservative prolifer but forcing so many of them to defend him his crudeness, his derogatory comments (Christ never demeaned people when he spoke truths). We look like hypocrites telling the world that we care about the sinful affects of porn yet justifying a presidential candidate who married a porn model.
Archbishop Chaput,
I have always respected your strong adherence to our faith, especially your outspoken defense of all right to life issues. However, I am greatly disappointed with this personal thought, which is so uncharacteristically misleading of the election at hand.
Your Eminence, you are the shepherd of an all important flock in Pennsylvania, one that will be critical towards the outcome of this presidential election. There has never been a candidate as unworthy as Hillary Clinton. This is not the time for the good leaders of the Church to hide behind principles of impartiality. Not since Reagan/Carter have Americans had such a contrast between good and evil. I can’t believe that Trumps candidacy is even remotely considered questionable. Its not even in the same galaxy compared to Hillary. Yes he has a past of infidelity, but for a Christian (not Catholic) he is on par. How can we hold him accountable for such infidelity when his conscience has not been properly formed and his Christian belief allows it?
Your Eminence, my wife and I have 5 children, are practicing Catholics and love God and our faith above all else. We will pray for a Trump presidency and pray that our Church leaders will strongly advocate for the same.
God bless you always.
I must add my voice to the many above. Yes, we have two extremely flawed candidates this year. One we know exactly how they will act because it is out openly the support for Planned Parenthood, abortion without limits and more progressive ideas. The Archbishop lays out how we as Catholics must be informed and know our faith. It is not a very big leap then to understand what our conscience demands as a Catholic, vote for the lesser of two evils and hope and pray that the promises to uphold life will be carried out. At least there is hope along that decision and total despair from the other choice
I wonder what Jesus would have thought about this article?
Jesus spoke on love, republican on hate. What am I missing?
Seems like the pope gave a big hint about voting for Trump, but he did not talked about Clinton. What else do you need?
But Archbishop, Trump does not follow any of the teachings of Jesus and this troubles me greatly. He cannot even seem to turn the other cheek to the negative comments of his Twitter feed! His close ties to a Communist leader is also worrisome as they are very anti religious.
Archbishop Chaput knows we do not expect him to tell us whom to vote for. Seriously, he is right. The obvious imperfection of the candidates does not absolve us of responsibility to use our vote to do the best we can for our country and not opt out because candidates have evident flaws. The message I take away from this is that we must pray. There is too much petty rancor, fear, and even hatred in the air this election season, and too much discouraging indifference as a result. Catholics know better than that. A conscientious decision is not an automatic response. Discernment takes prayer and attention to the guidance of the Church, which despite its evident flaws, is still the instrument of the Holy Spirit and the guardian of truth in our fallen world,
What is wrong with the leaders of our beautiful Catholic Church. We clearly must vote for Donald Trump. He is prolife and Hillary Clinton is pro abortion not only that so is the platform of the Demcratic party. The next president will appoint Supreme Court justices that will also be pro abortion. I am so disappointed. No wonder people are leaving our church.
Dear Archbishop Chaput, Thank you for your informative remarks concerning the upcoming Presidential Electiion.
I would like to add two facts for voters consideration, especially Catholics.
1. Donald Trump has stated that if elected he will name new Supreme Conservative Court Justices who will strictly make their decisions based on rhe Constitution and who will be in the mild of Justice Antonin Scalia’
2. If Hillary Clinton is elected she will name Justices who will uphold Roe Vs Wade, and in fact strengthen it and remove ALL attempts to overturn R vs. V. She has also made a commitment to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers that “she will have their back”
#. I considered registering Independent many years ago because I was disgusted with both party’s. However representatives of BOTH party’s told me that I would have NO vote in the Primary, and in the general election the ONLY candidate I could vote for would be the one either of them nominated. They stated that in effect I would be throwing my vote away. They also stated the only worth an Independent vote has is as a minority opposition vote. It would effectively be a NO VOTE.
Many Catholics have been Cradle Catholiss / Democrats. I’ve met many Nuns at the polls who had no idea of the Candidaates position on abortion or other Catholic values. They are the born and raised Catholic Democrats. AS I WAS FOR MANY YEARS UNTI I FINALLYGOT INVOLVED IN THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT.
God Bless you Bishop.
Why not bring the prayer of St. Michael back at the end of mass, since this is also a spiritual battle?
I do not understand how any level headed Catholic can sit unmoved by Donald Trump’s violently targeted language towards Muslim Americans. Whether or not Trump finds a seat in any political office, his rhetoric (and doubling down of that rhetoric) is noteworthy in national conversations around religion. Our Muslim communities in America celebrate pro-family values, a respect for life, and charity. The failure of Americans of any faith to condemn Trump’s language on Muslims is dangerous, and especially so for us as Catholics.
Both candidates have records of engaging in morally comprising activities (Clinton in elected office and Trump in his business career). Clinton – and the Democratic Party – have embraced the national policy of abortion (as they have more or less for many decades). All of this must be taken into account, but I am particularly concerned for our Muslim neighbors, as violent language against their lives are becoming common place within our society. To not include a strong denouncement of Trump’s campaign rhetoric in a discussion between the two candidates is very troubling.
To suggest that she or any other sitting President can fundamentally alter the foundation of our government seems a bit overblown, especially in one or two terms. However, having a President engage in rhetoric which promotes bigotry and potential violence seems to have far more potential for disaster.
American Catholics can always count on Archbishop Chaput to reach out to us. He never stays silent and safe. I would only comment that I am voting for the Republican Party, period. Why, because of the Supreme Court. The Democrats would literally destroy the Constitution, thus destroying America. I remember Saint Mother Teresa telling Americans that if they continue with abortion, America will be destroyed. The Republican Party can eliminate abortion in this country. One issue alone could bring graces to America. Our Lady of Guadalupe, Protectoress of the Unborn is the Hope for America.
Thank you, Archbishop Chaput for reminding us that to be faithful Catholics we are first and foremost Catholic Americans, not American Catholics. The idea that we should not judge has been taken completely out of context when it comes to politicians who are clearly out of step with the teachings of the Church.
I guess I do not understand your comment. I feel that I am first and foremost a Catholic who happens to be American. My faith is more important than my nationality. My Catholicism does not make me any less of an American patriot. Therefore I am an American (proper adjective) Catholic (proper noun).
I am appalled that our Archbishop thinks that “neither candidate is better than the other” But he certainly can’t believe that neither candidate is worse than the other. There is no denying anymore that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party are ;not just pro-abortion, but have totally embraced the extreme positions of abortion on demand for any reason, by any means at any time up until birth. Perhaps the Archbishop missed what happened at the Democratic National Convention. Not only was Cecile Richards, the CEO of Planned Parenthood, given a prominent speaking role, but the evening before her speech, she was given a prominent seat at the side of former president Bill Clinton watching the proceedings. This tells you one thing. Hillary Clinton has no problem with the evil business of Planned Parenthood.
The Archbishop states that “God is always concerned with good and evil”. Planned Parenthood’s business, goals and activities are evil. Their business is killing unborn children. Their goal is to have the taxpayer pay for it. They fight every reasonable restriction. They sell fetal body parts.
How can a Catholic vote for her? I get dismayed at Donald Trump’s style and personality. But he is getting advice and surrounding himself with good people. He has promised to appoint good Supreme Court justices. Hillary’s appointments will be a disaster for life. There may be a lot of unknown regarding what Trump will do, but we know what we’re getting with Clinton.
The Democrat party platform supported by Clinton is filled with intrinsic evil such as support of abortion and sodomy. The Republican platform supported by Trump has no intrinsic evil and actually supports direct parent education of children through homeschooling and vouchers. A faithful Catholic can only vote for Trump as he is the only candidate for restricting abortion.
In my opinion Archbishop Chaput is a wonderful and holy man and one that I would listen to. But really, I’m not sure what he is saying here. I only know that the platform of the Democratic Party says that Abortion is a right. I know that this is not true. So, unfortunately, I will most probably vote for Trump…sadly, and hope that he is telling us the truth. Mrs. Clinton has made her views VERY clear.
God bless us all!
I love Archbishop Chaput, but I will have no problem voting for Trump!!! The Democratic party has become THE party that is so anti-God it is sickening!!! Archbishop Chaput, please what are you not seeing????
Archbishop Chapter is very insightful as he discussed a Catholic’s great problem of how to vote this year. Pay attention to the signs of our times. The Lord will meet us halfway in our decision making this year. Archbishop has given us the resources we need to turn to if we are truly serious about voting. He is so correct when he urges us to do serious fasting and praying with the heart. Give Jesus a chance in your final choice. God bless all
You are a great hero of mine but ‘neither is clearly better than the other’ will confuse many many Catholics. I actually really wonder if that is what you meant.
First of all the average Catholic doesn’t read anything the USCCB writes. In fact the average Catholic doesn’t go to Mass! :) I’m a nerd and read some of the “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship” and I fell asleep. We are voting for a “Commander and Chief”! Not a “Commander and Saint”.
A faithful catholic can’t vote for a pro abortion candidate .How can you vote for a pro abortion candidate that following him or her is an immense cemetery of more than 50 million of innocent children behind them? We can pray for them but we can not vote for them.
I believe God has given us the rules we need to live by, they are called the 10 Commandments. One of the commandments, Thou shall not kill, means in any instance. ABortion is the taking of a human life. TRump is the only one who will stand up for life. I hope all Catholics will remember this when going to the polls.
the first question is: Do you support Abortion? If the answer is ‘Yes’, then we can’t vote for that person… if ‘No’, then the next question should be, Will you actively fight to end Abortion in the United States? If the answer is ‘No’, then we can’t vote for that person… if ‘Yes’, then the next question should be, Will you try to stop the support the U.S. gives to the U.N. to do Abortions worldwide? If the answer is ‘No’, then we can’t vote for that person… that is just a start. And this is Roman Catholic Teaching.
I mostly agree with Archbishop Chaput. I think his hands are tied with government tax exemption to say what he really thinks.
I seem to recall Old Testament scripture where God did pick winners and place Kings, so maybe His way is what we should pray for.
I think the comment, “The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.”
Did you catch that? The US still performs about 1 Million abortions a year under Democrats. Not sure what’s worse, keeping out terrorists and people who hate us or 1 Million humans being exterminated per year? You can pick neither, but don’t make the wrong choice.
As many have pointed out, Clinton and the democratic platform are pro-abortion, from conception through to birth (partial.)
With all due respect for the office of the Archbishop, I pray that my brother in faith will indeed say many Hail Marys before pulling that lever, as we all should, and before writing another article such as this. These words of the Archbishop only help pro-abortion Catholics to justify their position in voting for a pro-abortion candidate (leaving them floundering in mortal sin), and still claim to be practicing Catholics in good faith.
The Republican platform this year has been described as the most pro-life in history. Trump has named the pro-life justices he will appoint and has met with pro-life leaders and promised to BE a pro-life leader himself. Clinton has promised, and her words and record guarantee the opposite. Without a pro-life leader, we as a nation are doomed – and that includes both American citizens and legal and illegal visitors!
That any candidate will keep their promises is clearly a gamble. But the choice here is indeed not that difficult – a chance of hope or no hope. Perhaps since abortion has been legal for so long now, many of us Catholics have lost the understanding, the passion, for what abortion really is. Aborted children never even get the chance to be refugees!
In all due respect to the archbishop, his column seriously flawed on so many levels. First of all, to suggest that since both candidates are wealthy, that this automatically disqualifies both candidates is simply reckless. There is nothing wrong with being wealthy, and I myself am not wealthy. Also to state that God would never prefer one party over the other is silly. But the Archbishop goes even further, calling it BLASPHEMOUS! Sorry Archbishop, but the Republican party seeks to protect the rights of the unborn. And this IS the most important issue facing this nation. For without the unborn, there are no other issues.
The Democratic party stands for gay marriage and abortion on demand. They also almost narrowly voted to take God out of the party platform a few years back. Donald Trump may have flaws, but they are nothing in comparison to Hillary Clinton.
If I had a choice being someone speaking their mind or someone lying to the American people year after year, then I would have to choose the someone who simply speaks their mind.
Thank you Archbishop for your clear, unmistakable teaching. You are truly a great light in the American Church. God Bless you!
Archbishop Chaput- I have great respect for you. I have considered you for a long time now as one of the spiritual anchors of our Church. Your steadfast defense of the Magisterium over the past decade has been a soothing balm for many of us who cringe and recoil at what passes for theology and pastoralism in many of our dioceses.
That said, I think you have missed the mark here. I agree with the basic premise that both candidates have significant flaws that, in any other electoral year, would disqualify them. However, we are where we are. Looking at both candidates objectively, one very clearly and expressly supports so many issues and concepts that are antithetical to Church teaching that one might be forgiven for believing that we are living through one of the chapters in the Lord of the World. That same candidate has a cloud of scandal that follows her everywhere she goes and is connected to so many anti-Catholic and globalist groups that she would be good material for a Tom Clancy novel. Even her position on immigration, which many Philly residents have blindly accepted as consistent with Church teaching, is plainly not because it pays no attention to the central concept of subsidiarity which is so critical to prudent and sound judgment by governmental bodies. In short, I cannot conceive of any circumstance where it would be rational, let alone moral, to cast a vote for her.
Trump is by no means a good candidate. As I said above, he is significantly flawed. His flaws are not his money or his “buffoonery.” These are meaningless. His real flaws have to do with his character. He does not appear to be a man of virtue, humility, or integrity. This is what we need most, and what we get the least, from our leaders in both parties. Nevertheless, at least his platform and his proposals will give room for unborn children to enjoy the most basic of rights- to exist- and to those “of good will” to live their lives with less of what has now become oppressive interference from their government. On these issues alone, there is simply no comparison. There is likewise no other issue on which Mrs. Clinton provides “serious” Catholics of the kind you describe above, any reasonable option.
Archbishop Chaput, I thank you again for your spiritual leadership and your solid witness to the faith. You have been a great inspiration for me in a very troubled and troubling world. I ask you, as a member of the laity who cares about you, on issues such as these where the laity have greater experience, and sometimes even wisdom, consult and consider more deeply before publishing. God bless you.
When trump secured the votes for the nomination – I registered as an independent. Simply put – trumps actions and his words do not match and I don’t believe him on abortions, guns, or even bringing back jobs. Clinton is simply unelectable because of her record especially on abortion. I’m voting 3rd party for the first time and it feels good not to hold my nose. Right is right, even if everybody else is wrong – and I’m voting for right, I’m voting for a good man – and at least I’ll sleep well at night knowing I did the right thing while no matter which of the other two candidates wins there will only be more division and polarization. Good luck with that – I’m done with party politics.
Really brilliant an observation. All of have flaws, including you & me. So a citizen has one full vote & must decide which is the better of the two in this case, Donald J. Trump, without a doubt.
….”Both major candidates are – what’s the right word? so problematic – that neither is clearly better than the other.”
With all due respect good bishop, one would think even a half hearted Catholic could reason which candidate’s platform was more “Anti-Church” if they had the slightest understanding that we are truly in the age of Church vs anti-Church….and you surely believe this is true. We have so long accepted (ignored) elected Catholics, predominately democrats, who vote, legislate, and judge contrary to Church law and dogma, excusing themselves from all guilt as if public office places them above the requirements of their faith, that the smoke of Satan within the Church which the popes have spoken of has blinded our vision of truth.
‘It’s absurd – in fact, it’s blasphemous – to assume that God prefers any political party in any election year. ‘
I can just about concur with your statement above, Archbishop, but only in view of the degeneracy of US politics and its ‘bought and paid for politicians’, and dog-eat-dog capitalism, but not in principle. What are your grounds for saying such a thing ?
The post-war Labour Party in Britain, while still benefiting from the residual Christian culture of the Tory Establishment, created a marvelous welfare state – in which he who had much, did not have too much (not quite true, but true enough), and he who little did not have to little.
One parent was the breadwinner and most people had a modest but agreeable disposable income. It was a low- income, low-cost economy. And there was next to no homelessness, still less, sleeping rough.
Moreover, the Tories had to adapt to compete, and themselves perpetuate he One Nation politics initiated by the Labour Party, which had been founded by Keir Hardie, a Methodist lay-preacher.
Perhaps rather than being so judgmental regarding others ‘astonishing flaws’ we should consider our own. There is so much more to Catholic social teaching that seems to be ignored. Let’s not turn this in to the typical campaign of a two issue election.
As a Catholic high school theology teacher, I must admit to being a bit confused about Archbishop Chaput’s most recent column and would hope he would be able to clarify. I have always understood the Catholic Church’s teaching as it relates to our civic duty to vote as suggesting that no Catholic in good conscience can vote for a candidate who supports an action that is intrinsically evil (meaning by its very nature it is always wrong under any and all circumstances and can never be debated). There are plenty of issues such as immigration, war, healthcare, etc., that may not be intrinsically evil in and of themselves, but can be openly discussed. Abortion, as the Catholic Church defines, is the deliberate killing of an unborn child and is gravely contrary to the moral, and, therefore, can never be acceptable!
The 2016 Democratic party platform calls for support of abortion on demand for any reason up until birth and demands for repeal of the Hyde Amendment which, if overturned, would force taxpayers to fund abortions. On the other hand, the 2016 Republican party platform affirms that the unborn child has a fundamental right to life which cannot be infringed. Both candidates say they fully support all positions on their party’s platform. Is there a moral equivalency here that I am overlooking?
Agreed & well said Joe. In light of this truth I believe one is left with two choices, vote for Trump or don’t vote at all (or vote 3rd party candidate, which is in effect the same as not voting). However, not voting I believe neglects one’s duty as a Catholic & in effect amounts to a half vote for Hillary, the purveyor of an intrinsically evil platform. So I think logic dictates a fairly simple choice. I think the archbishops letter in essence directs its readers to the same conclusion after deep reflection, particularly with the following “But neither are all pressing issues equal in foundational importance or gravity. The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.”
Joe, The fixation you and others here regarding abortion is confusing to me, a recent Catholic convert. Our government is not requiring anyone to abort a child presently. It is not requiring anyone to own a gun, either. It is simply allowing people who want either thing to go ahead with what they feel their life requires.
As I understand, God has allowed sin and evil to exist in this world. It is up to each individual to choose what they will do with their ability to reproduce (we pray in a faithful marriage) or handle firearms (we pray never to wrongly kill another.)
Do you really think forcing either issue will make the vast population of Non-Catholic Americans take you more seriously? How much harder the actual work of living a model married life, rejecting the temptations and discerning as best one can with daily prayer!
I welcome our Archbishop’s open and honest personal thoughts. He has lead an extraordinary life in service to the Church and I feel blessed that he’d care enough to begin the discussion we are now in!
Great response!!!! Thanks!!!I was confused by the Bishop too!!
How disappointing that Archbishop Chaput refuses to acknowledge the clear differences between the two candidates. Especially since the businessman is misogynistic, racist, thrice married man who doesn’t show an ounce of compassion for immigrants or the poor, and once even mocked a disable man. The Archbishop clearly supports the immigrant community (http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/for-archbishop-chaput-holy-family-provides-lesson-on-immigration/), but won’t judge the businessman candidate on his language against immigration or his call for barring Muslims from our country. He doesn’t however seem to have a problem judging our Catholic vice president, and vice presidential nominee. We all have flaws and our own viewpoint- I just wish Archbishop Chaput would admit that he prefers the Republican Party and not pretend he’s judging both equally.
Your unfair judgments of V.P. Biden and Senator Tim Kaine’s catholicism is wrong. They are exceptionally good catholic men and followers of their faith. As or representatives, they uphold our enacted laws. Their personal views are their own.
“Judge not, lest you be judged”.
Really?!? “Exceptionally good Catholic men and followers of their faith?” Since when? Both men are adamantly pro-abortion. You can’t be a Catholic in good standing and in support of abortion! It does not jive with Church teaching. One cannot separate “personal views” and religious belief. Neither of these men should present himself for receiving the Eucharist at mass each Sunday until each has repented of his pro-abortion views and has decided to follow Church teaching and act like real Catholic gentlemen.
You absolutely have your hands full Archbishop. Know that you and all priests are in my prayers. Fiat Voluntas Tua!
I completely disagree with the Archbishop’s views on this upcoming election. Hillary Clinton and the democrat party have been using the poor in our country for decades and will continue to do so. Donald Trump isn’t the perfect candidate but he is better than having the corrupt, lying, money hungry Clinton. I don’t understand how intelligent, caring people can be so fooled by her for so long?
The Archbishop offers a clear Catholic perspective on the conundrum of this election. Yesterday’s Gospel helps point the way — we must seek truth before we’ll have peace. Not much truth to pass around between the major party candidates.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput. I do think we need to pray and think clearly about the upcoming 10-40 years. A lot of the future of this country sits on who will be placed into the Supreme Court vacant slots. We as Catholics are not voting for a king in this election. We need to think clearly about who will allow us to worship Our King freely as Catholics. The Church is under attack in this country. The next 4 years will demonize us more for what we believe if Hillary is our president. We are voting for survival and an opportunity to be heard for at least 4 more years.
Please add to your teadi g list a book by Sheila Liaugminas, The Non-Negotialbles:…”, a brilliant book.
It’s sad that the Archbishop doesn’t read the documents produced by the Ordinary Magisterium under Pope Francis. If he had, he would not find himself in such a quandary.
To which documents generated by Pope Francis do you refer when you say they are part of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium?
Quite simply, Donald Trump does not have the temperament to be POTUS…or any experience suitable to lead the greatest nation in the world. I believe his temperament will be the deciding factor (and the current polling surely is pointing the way to a huge defeat for this entertainer on November 8). And despite certain positions counter to Catholic stances, Democrats, generally speaking, are far more supportive of the poor and social justice. Lastly, do you think Trump the egotist ever asks anyone, “What do you think?”
Nick, you ask “what do you think”, well, I think you are totally wrong, but “who am I to judge”. Just so you you know there is a difference between “judging” and “discerning”. God expects us to “discern” right from wrong, good from bad, holy from evil, etc, etc. We can do that without “judging” the person who causes us to “discern” their behavior. It is fine to condemn wrong behavior so long as we don’t also condemn the person (which no one but God can do) Also conscience is simply how one thinks, but what one thinks is “formed” by their choices, which God also expects us to discern. So one can have a good conscience or a poor conscience depending on how the person has discerned to form it. For a Catholic it should always be guided by church teaching and based on faith and reason. Faith tells us killing is wrong, reason tells us we have NO rights if we are not first given the right to exist. It is the ultimate in “social justice” to allow God’s creation in the womb to exist outside the womb. The “baby” has a soul, is created in the image of God (the same as you) and has the “right to life” above all other rights, not only by the constitution of the USA but by God’s law which states “Thou shalt not kill”. If we deny “one of God’s little ones” the right to life they won’t have a chance to even be “poor” and receive any “social justice”. I have “discerned your argument to be a truly bad one, and that you have not formed your conscience in a manner agreeable to God’s laws. It is my opinion that the Republican platform allows more “religious freedom”, provides babies with a better chance of being born, better supports the church’s definition of marriage, will fight the evil of pornography better, will better provide work, education, and dignity to the poor (not enslave them in poverty), If you compare the platforms of the two parties one could discern the Democrat platform as evil and the Republican as more socially just. But of course one has to be able to see reality, be emptied of biases, and open to truth in order to discern that. Doing the reading recommended by bishop Chapot is a good idea and would provide for development of a “good conscience”, thus allowing you to vote in a manner truly pleasing to God.
Separation of church and state does not prohibit a religious person from having a political view. It’s focus was on prohibiting the country from establishing its own state religion as was the case in Great Britain. Political views based on our Christian beliefs will make our country better and is something we should strive for.
I totally disagree with the Archbishop’s view on this all important election. Hillary Clinton has voted against the catholic church throughout her long history in politics. She will undoubtedly appoint pro-abortion judges and continue the removal of all references to God everywhere in our society. She arrogantly and blatantly lies to anyone who questions her ethics and previous actions, such as her failure to protect our ambassador and soldiers in Benghazi. If you take your religion seriously there is no possible argument you can make for Clinton. On the other hand Trump is not a perfect candidate but he is being relentlessly beat up by the liberal media. On issues that really matter he is much better than clinton, his judges will be pro-life, his economic plan will create jobs and he will re-boot the school voucher program that helps poor minority kids. The democrats despise the voucher program because it takes money away from their beloved teachers union and use the excuse that vouchers will benefit catholic schools as a major reason they oppose them. These are just a few reasons why you can’t be a politically correct tool for the media. Be careful Archbishop, the liberal media will use your words and try to convince catholics that Trump is bad because he is not politically correct. Don’t be a pawn for the anti-christian liberal media! Trump’s not perfect but he is not blatantly anti christian like hillary and today’s democrat party!! The so-called separation of church and state doesn’t mean catholic leaders should sit back like cowards and allow the liberal media to dictate how we vote!
Your implication that the good Archbishop is being used by the Left is insulting. There are many good Catholics who have already come to the same conclusions as he outlines after careful research, prayer, deep thought, and more prayer.
Neither candidate is worthy of my vote.
I’m debating between veteranspartyofamerica.org and veteranspartyofamerica.org – but I am certain to vote 3rd party, because that is where good change will originate. The D’s and the R’s have given us evil after evil. Voting for the lesser evil still gets you evil. Don’t get played by the the duopoly! Vote 3rd party.
Timothy Allen questions whether the Archbishop has read anything the Pope has written on the subject of voting in conformity with Catholic principles, so as to inform his own opinion. But Mr. Allen makes no specific suggestions in this regard and, frankly, nothing comes to mind. However, the Pope has been crystal clear that the abomination of abortion, the product of a “throw-away society” can never be accepted.
When Mr. Allen states that the Archbishop contributes to division, one is put in mind of Sunday’s gospel, when our Lord announced that He did not come to plant peace, “but division”. And that families of 5 would be divided 3 to 2. Seems the Archbishop is being criticized for being Christlike.
If Mr. Allen is upset that the Archbishop reminds us , among other things, of immutable Catholic teachings, then let Mr. Allen be upset that the Archbishop reminds us of immutable Catholic teachings. Catholics worthy of the name can endure such hardships.
I believe that this nation simply has to turn back to God. The USCCB should gather at the Basilica of the Immaculate Conception and at a Mass formally consecrate and/or rededicate the United States to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary – nothing short of a formal declaration will do. We as Catholics must formally and outwardly declare our sovereign Lord as king and his mother as our queen mother.
Our democracy provides that a person is not a criminal unless indicted and given a trial by jury. Calling her a criminal is false. Now if the archbishop wants to incriminate Director Comey, the Atty General, the former director of the CIA and a whole host of others, then we’d have a story. It’s best to stay out of politics, as we have a separation of church and state which should remain that way.
“Our democracy provides that a person is not a criminal unless indicted and given a trial by jury. Calling her a criminal is false.”
Being ‘should be under criminal indictment’ and being a criminal is not the same thing, precisely because of the presumption of innocence. Also, the presumption of innocence is only legally proscribed to the government. Individuals are under not legal obligation to presume innocence. We Catholics, in spirit of Christian charity, presume innocence. But that is not an impediment to saying someone who was not indicted of a crime should have been.
Could it be that FBI Director Comey and Attorney Loretta Lynch fear for their lives? Comey confirmed the violations when interrogated by Trey Gowdy. Loretta Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton. Likely went beyond small talk of Clinton’s grand babies. I’m concerned about Supreme Court Justice John Roberts who swore to uphold the Constitution and interpret the law, yet took the questionable “opportunity” to rewrite the law, the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare, not once but twice!
Let’s be clear: The Church REJECTS the concept of separation of Church and state. The bottom line is that the Church expects Her God-given authority to be upheld, supported, and promoted by the state. The state has no competence and no authority of its own over matters of religion and may not unilaterally interfere with its exercise. Therefore, where the state does not advance–and is indeed hostile to–the mission of the Church, religious freedom must be upheld vis-a-vis the state. This state of affairs does not exclude the Church from the public square.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput for your moral clarity and courage – morally confused times such as ours call for moral CLARITY, not AMBIGUITY.
If you think there isn’t a significant enough distinction between Clinton and Trump to make a decision, you are either ill-informed or are waiting for Jesus to run.
Cannot believe that the leader of the Church in which I was raised would equate Trump’s proven buffoonery to the belief people have about Clinton, despite proven otherwise. So we are to compare fact to mere thought??
Thank you Archbishop Chaput for a very insightful and thought provoking analysis.
As a “serious” Catholic I do have to respectfully take issue with your conclusion that neither candidate is clearly better than the other. In the eyes of God and per Catholic teaching there is no moral equivalency between an intrinsic evil and a sin. Yes it is true that Mr. Trump like all of us is sinful. Mrs. Clinton on the other hand is not only sinful, she is intrinsically evil by her words and deeds, including her militant and obstinate advocacy for abortion.
To choose intrinsic evil is always morally wrong and to imply that it can be justified under certain circumstances is a falsehood. This includes personal conscience choices which in the end can never supersede God.
Given the clear and present danger of a Hilary Clinton administration to the Church, and to countless thousands of innocent unborn souls, it is hard to understand why the Church continues to remain so unclear on how Catholics should be voting in the upcoming election. It is a moral tragedy in the making.
If there was ever a time for the Church to take a firm and unyielding stand for God and be a Moral Beacon, the time is now. The Church should make clear in new easy to read and clear voting guidelines and communiqués how Catholics are morally bound to vote in the upcoming presidential election:
1. Disqualification – No Catholic can vote for Hilary Clinton because of her positions on abortion an intrinsic evil and violation of God’s Law and Church Teaching
2. Vote – for Donald Trump or third party candidates based on preference
3. Abstain – no candidate qualifies
So, with all this good material, where is the message lost on the Catholic voter:
1. Make it bluntly clear – you must prioritize and one candidate promises more abortion deaths the other has promised to honor pro-life. Not hard to understand this one.
2. If Catholics do not listen to the pastor, forget them. If the pastor refuses to speak clearly on the issue of life 1st, life always is the issue. He needs to repent if he refuses to preach it!
I am a sister in faith and I find it hard to believe that a Shepard of Jesus would put Trump and Clinton in the same category. One spews hatred every time he opens his mouth and the other has worked as best she could within the political system to bring some relief to families in need. To me there is a very clear choice.
Hi Marie,. I’m sorry to say that your comment is wide of the mark. Some evils are greater than others. Some moral issues involve intrinsic evil such as abortion or euthanasia. Some moral issues involve exercising prudence in deciding on the best approach, such as how and who should care for the poor.
Trump would not have been my first choice but at least he is solid — and his Supreme Court nominees would be solid — on the intrinsic evils. Clinton is not, by any stretch of the imagination. To say that Trump spews hatred every time he opens his mouth is simply not true and you know that.
I rely on traditional moral analysis and solid Catholic moral theology. Do I agree with the Archbishop’s analysis? I think he has confused things and should have been less ambiguous.
Wow. It is because of Catholics like this that 59 million babies have been murdered in the United States. Catholics who block out all information about the criminals in public office who have kept the mass murder going, so they can pretend that these criminals “care about the poor” and other such propaganda. Wow.
You should consider Hillary Clinton’s verbal on TV threat that all the churches better change their ways because she’ll see women’s rights (abortion) and her views will win. Not since Henry VIII of England pronounce such antagonism to the Church, and yet, Bishop, you can’t make up your mind? Shame on you and every Catholic that would consider voting for a woman that lies to American citizens about the true state of world affairs, ISIS and hides her negotiations, takes bribes from foreign countries and flaunts our country’s laws. God help us.
Thank you, Archbishop Chaput,, for this thought provoking and insightful reflection! I was already reading Mary Eberstadt’s book and will be getting Reno’s book ASAP.
Let me see if I understand this right. The Democrat party stands for unlimited abortion, homosexual marriage, contraception, the destruction of the 2nd amendment, attempting to force the Catholic Church to expound secular perversions,etc. and neither is clearly better than the other.
To vote for a Democrat is almost always objectively mortal sin as it currently stands. At this point I cannot think of any current Democrat that would be an exception.
A couple of G.K. Chesterton quotes:
“There are many ways to fall but only one way to stand.”
“I want a church that moves the world not one that moves with it.”
“Don’t be so open-minded that your brains fall out.”
And how about this quote from Pope Francis, “Who am I to judge?”
AMEN.
As a pro-life catholic I am again troubled by many politically motivated voters who use our church and Life issues as a backdrop to vote for either candidate. It hurts life’s message. I take my faith very seriously, I read the Gospels and already as required reading read Havel’s Power of the Powerless.
My concern is how political pundits who waste no time attacking the Catholic Church’s stance on Immigration, the Plight of the Poor, and in-tack families will again pick and chose their form of Catholicism to promote their candidate, and not Life. Your Excellency, I fear this message does just that.
Well said George.
George, I agree with your premise. I think the concern for some (not those who quote Francis’ “Who am I to judge?” as though the Pope meant “Never use judgement.”) is whether candidate Trump will maintain Republican values regarding life, marriage and freedom. I myself am willing to vote for the devil I don’t know – because following through on promises of court appointees is expected by those who help elect him – as opposed to the devil I do know, the pro-abortion, anti-marriage, power-hungry candidate and party on the left (not to offend the well-intentioned liberal who only sees the humanitarian efforts of the left.).
Pope Francis’s comment, “who am I to judge?”, referred specifically to the example of a person who repents, renounces sin, and sincerely seeks God. Show us a presidential candidate or a candidate for any office who repents, renounces, and seeks; and the Holy Father’s admonition will rightly apply. Otherwise, his words must not be taken from their proper context. I agree with Mr. Kadlec’s comments and enjoyed his Chesterton quotes very much.
The “Who am I to Judge” comment has been rediculously used for too many topics. “Judging” is not the same as “discerning”, God wants us to discern what is good from what is bad, what is evil from what is holy, what is right from what is wrong, etc, etc. We can do this without “judging” the “person” that causes us to “discern” their behavior. Calling out the behavior for what it is, is simply informing about the truth and is not condemning the person, but rather their behavior. That said, the behavior (and platform) of the Democrat party as a whole (as stated above) has been bad, evil, and wrong for decades. God holds us “responsible” for the results of our vote, or for inaction there of. For example if we vote for a person we know will provide unrestricted abortion, aid in the destruction of traditional marriage, lessen or destroy religious freedom etc. God will “judge” us as responsible for not properly “discerning”. Our choices in this life are the choices we make for where we end up in eternity, Vote, but vote wisely.
Your article expresses what so many of us Catholics feel. One candidate offends our sensibilities as Christians, the other we deem untrustworthy. Where does one go from there? I will reluctantly vote from conscience but in the meantime, I pray to God for His guidance for the national conscience.
Presidents come and go. In the long run it is who is appointed to the Supreme Court for life and steers the real national conscience. This should be a part of anyone’s calculus when pulling the presidential lever.
I think your thoughts ring true with many. Perhaps God is reminding us that He is still on the throne, and that as Americans we have shifted our focus on trusting one man/woman to guide our country. Maybe as Christians we will remember to pray daily, for our country, our leaders, each other. I think hard times are ahead, either way. But Christ still rules.
If Hillary is allowed to create an extremist Supreme Court, you will find that the American Catholic world will come tumbling down. Every pro-life law on the books will be struck down. free public colleges will put Catholic schools out of business, and religious conscience rights will be the stuff of history books. I’m not so sure that God is neutral regarding political parties.
Think about the Supreme Court when voting: It’s a clear choice for me, who am thoroughly prolife: God help this nation if Clinton gets elected!
I thank you for this sobering reflection, very important for us to hear from a Catholic bishop. Both presidential candidates are indeed astonishingly flawed and problematic. However, one is a relentlessly aggressive and ambitious promoter of abortion, such that even if her stance on any other issue appealed to a genuinely Catholic voter, such a voter should be bound in conscience not to vote for her. Other voting options such as you mention remain open, but, at least in my view, not this one. Again, thank you, Excellency, for your reflection.
Many of your references predate the Pope’s instruction not to obsess on abortion. Will those sources be rewritten to reflect Francis’ position?
Trump is now anti-abortion and promises to repeal Johnson amendment.
No president can independently alter the laws regarding abortion. That has to be done through legislative and/or judicial processes and that is where those who have strong moral convictions either way can and must fight their fights. That issue aside, I think it would be irresponsible to vote for a candidate who is clearly incompetent by temperament as well as by lack of common sense or even common civility. I need not name names.
One of the flawed candidates will be the next President of the USA!
My not-so-mysterious calculus is:
* I will vote for the lesser of the two flawed candidates;
* I will vote for the one most likely top defend life from cradle to the grave;
* I will vote for the one most likely to defend my right to not just worship my
Faith, but my duty to practice my Faith;
* I will vote for the one who supports my right and duty to protect myself
and my family from unjust aggression;
* I well vote for the candidate most likely to appoint judges to the Supreme
Court who have judicial temperament and who are defenders of the
Constitution.
If as you say, Your Grace, the right to life undergirds all other rights, methinks “pulling the voting lever” in favour Donald Trump” must be the way to go….
Delighted to see a broader viewpoint than who is for unborn life- a too typical RC viewpoint and favoured too often by some Churchmen who damage the Church’s integrity and their independence as pastors. Teach us year round with your priests however butt out at election time
Some personal thoughts on your essay… It’s pretty surprising that you paint this false equivalency between the the two candidates and political parties. Only one party is responsible for the polarization by the constant chant of hate and fear from Fox News, and only one party selected an uneducated, racist, misogynistic, madman to be their candidate. Jesus would find this political party’s worship of the NRA and its weapons of death morally reprehensible.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput for an excellent letter. Let us conduct ourselves in an attitude of prayer toward those with whom we disagree and for ourselves as we seek to draw closer to God and to his people.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/births.htm
http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/
1 out of every 5 new Americans are exterminated. Far outnumbering deaths by terrorism, gun violence, etc. I will vote party line (Republican) Archbishop until the Democrats allows room for pro lifers or those who believe in the traditional definition of marriage.
Thank you for this thoughtful commentary, and most especially, thank you for your continuous courageous leadership and witness to our faith.
I will keep you in my prayers.
No common sense comments accepted?
Be aware that in 2009 Hillary Clinton proudly accepted the Planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger Award. Sanger viewed blacks as weeds that should be exterminated. She was a eugenicists. Recall that Bill Clinton vetoed the partial birth abortion ban. Senator Dole said that there was a fine line between partial-birth abortion and infanticide – something to ponder. Is there really any difference at all?
In August of 2015 Ministers Taking A Stand wrote to the Director of the The National Portrait Gallery Smithsonian Institution in DC and requested that the bust of the racist Sanger, who they stated spoke at the rallies of KKK women, be removed. Learn more about Sanger and her Negro Project.
History tells us that the eugenics movement was initiated by a group of liberal elites not only the U.S. but also in Europe, particularly in Germany. The movement was picking up popular support in those areas until the advent of WW II. The popularity of the eugenics movement quickly died because of the horror of the holocaust. Sanger who an eugenicist, was heavily involved early in the movement particularly in the southern part of the U.S. with the Negro population.
Planned Parenthood continues to suppress the growth of minority populations by locating 70% of its abortion facilities within or near black and Latino communities.
Donald Trump has not been a strong pro-lifer in the past however he is not the radical pro-abort that the Clintons have been. He has spoken saying he is now pro-life. The GOP Platform contains a strong Pro-Life plank thanks to Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum who resides in St. Louis, MO.
Years back when standing in the annual pro-life prayer chain our Associate Pastor commented that the most important social justice issue was abortion. He served at St. Clement of Rome in Des Peres, MO. His name is Fr. Nicholas Muenks.
Trump is certainly the better alternative!!! To vote third party will not accomplish anything. So I suggest you vote for the candidate who is not perfect but considerably better.
Thank you good Shepard!………..come Holy Spirit and renew the hearts of our Nation……
If only half, if not all, of the US Bishops, taught in the public forum, Americans would not be morally adrift. It is a pity that Abp. Chaput is writing as such that gets him such acclaim. It is the job of the Bishop, per Canon Law, to be the Shepherd. Yet, Americans, as sheep, smell pretty badly, which is to say their Bishops are AWOL
I am astounded that our Archbishop equates these two candidates in any way.
Trump is increasingly criticized for his incendiary and hateful speech, yet, continues to double down on his violent rhetoric.
Clinton embraces the downtrodden, not just in the US, but abroad, and seeks to bring more love and kindness to those in need.
I hope that our Archbishop will eventually distance himself from the vitriol and abuse emanating from Donald Trump and his campaign. Even the Holy Father sees the difference between the messages from these two candidates!
My vote goes to Trump. He presumably stands on the RNC platform, which is pro-life. After all, if one is put to death, all other issues become moot.
Thank you Archbishop, for directing all thinking Catholics and those not of the True Church, to some serious books and documents that will give us a thorough understanding of what our vote will do or not, by what we decide!!! Finally a voice of reason at this time of utter darkness….
So disappointed to hear you say both candidates are equally flawed. Hillary is a corrupt liar who has been in politics for over 40 years. She’s part of the elite cabal that wants complete dominion over all of us. Worst of all, she’s rabidly pro-choice, which is antithetical to Church teaching. Trump, on the other hand, is pro-life. Since you claim in your essay that respect for life is the #1 issue Catholics should consider, the choice is clear. Trump 2016.
Thank you for this — and thank you, most particularly, for avoiding the simplistic, and therefore necessarily dishonest, reductions of the issues. I’m enormously grateful.
(from Raleigh, NC, Diocese)
Excellent reflection for the faithful Catholic to ponder in prayer. Helps support my homily this weekend on Luke’s “division” gospel. Take your anxiety to God in prayer. Listen for His answer. Perhaps it will be a question…’What would Jesus do?’
I highly doubt this will be published, how ever if there is any integrity in this journalistic publication, perhaps it will. An individual with the rock solid Catholic credentials but dubious Christian ones ought not dabble in politics. One only need to look to the events of the past decade to support this. If you want to preach politics from the pulpit, fine. Here is your tax bill. When paid in full, I’ll listen to your point of view. To compare Secretary ClintonTo Donald Trump is not only inaccurate, it’s intellectually lazy. This is not a decision between the lesser of two evils. It’s the decision between right and wrong. If you are basing that decision on the subject of abortion, stop the hypocrisy. Look at your flock and their record and opinion on the subject. Just stop. Enough.
With all due respect to the cardinal, I was disappointed in the Cardinals comments. He missed the opportunity to speak out clearly and specifically to Catholics about the articles of our faith that should be considered when voting. They are: the right to life at any stage of development; definition of marriage and the family; and protection of religious freedom which is under attack today. His comments and those of some of the leaders of the USCCB remind me of angels dancing on the head of a pin concerning these paramount political issues.
Such generalities hardly assist one in carefully discerning which candidate, in spite of personal flaws, actually holds positions that best accord with or who has expressed the intention of fulfilling principles which accord with subsidiarity and establishing true conditions that will encourage a culture of law and order as well as economic vitality which can encourage the stability and flourishing of families.
I should think this is more important than painting vague generalizations about dislikes of this or that personality flaws in a candidate.
The problem with saying both candidates are horrible really does nothing to show who the enemy of the Catholic church is. Trump has said concerning things ,but his actions are far more supportive to conservative principles including him saying he is the pro life candidate, which I hope is true. He said build a wall but he at least recognizes the legal system is necessary for safe and controlled immigration, he said put a stop to immigration from at risk countries which is temporary and common sense and has been done before multiple times. crassHillary on the other hand is blatantly on the record anti religious freedom, pro death, , pro murder,pro PC,pro illegal open border. Pro Machiavellian politics to enhance government growth and takeover and Exorbitant high taxes. Those who vote for such an extreme pro abortion person need to understand their own soul is in jeopardy voting for her. Furthermore she will elect judges that will drag this country further into a totalitarian style government reminiscent of communist / socialist regimes. ” Socialism, is communism” said Lenin, and the democratic parties platform is 99% based on big government and dictatorial societies.
So if you vote independent, or don’t vote, then your creating part of the problem. The two majors in the ballot will be trump and Clinton, everything else does not change this country or even Stave off the extreme liberal ideologies trampling the constitution as through the Obama term. Hillary is Obama 2.0 and far worse, their platform pushes the same agenda.
We need good conservative judges in place! We need leaders with tangible morals and values. Also almost 99% of all media is character assassinating Trump,you must ask why and how much is agenda driven lies.
“or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates…”
Despite the positive comments here, I find this article yet another disturbing sign that the Catholic establishment is going to assist the election of Hilda Beast by condoning abstention or useless third party voting, which is effectively a Catholic vote for Hillary. There is no “mysterious calculus” at work here. Trump promises to fill Supreme Court vacancies from a list of eleven judicial conservatives, and his running mate declares that Roe v. Wade must be consigned to the “ash heap of history.” Hillda Beast, on the other hand, will certainly nominate radical ideologues who favor abortion on demand and “gay marriage,” who will tyrannize American for at least another generation. Moreover, she is campaigning on a promise to provide government subsidized abortions, repealing the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits such funding.
What exactly is “mysterious” here? The Catholic choice is obvious: Trump. As for the “lesser of two evils” argument, every American election in living memory has presented the lesser of two evils. But Catholics who vote for Trump are not CHOOSING the lesser of two evils, but rather are mitigating harm to the common good without endorsing any position of Trump’s that might be at odds with Catholic teaching. The principle of double effect clearly applies.
A great article and a sage bit of advice by Archbishop Chaput! We are not here on Earth to judge one another. We need to forgive and try to get along. I find it nearly impossible to NOT judge these 2 candidates! One is an egomaniac unable to control his emotional thought. The other has a long trail of horrible abuses of power and dishonesty. Tough choice for sure. Prayer and deep thought will be our only chance to make a selection that is palatable. Thank you Archbishop!
Good insight, however, it is easy to decide what candidate we Catholics need. Think of the Supreme Court Judges that will be replaced!!!
What about the fact that American Bishops supported the Affordable Care Act, which has driven up healthcare costs, made insurance completely uneconomical, threatened religious liberty, and has resulted in the downturn of charitable contributions to parish collections. My own mother has had to cut back on how much she tithes because she has to pay 40% more in health insurance!
What do you or any Bishop have to say about your support of that law? I’m voting for Trump, he’s not perfect but Hillary Clinton is much worse.
As always – a thoughtful, practical, and faithful exhortation to Catholics and people of good faith. Thank you, your Excellency!
This is very confusing, to say the least. Not at all what we would expect from the normally clear-headed guidance from Archbishop Chaput. It is true that Mr. Trump is not any Catholic’s ideal of a presidential candidate. However, to make a general moral equivalent out of the two, without making distinctions regarding, inter alia, abortion, is misleading at best. Where is the real guidance we need in this election year regarding, say, the theological concept of Double Effect? Not to mention JP II’s emphasis on “limiting harm”? Roman Catholic voters need doctrinally sound assistance from our priests and bishops, not smug hand-wringing!
Archbishop, your column leaves me confused and depressed. You state that it is blasphemous to assume that God prefers one political party over the other yet you also point out that the right to life undergirds all other rights. There is no doubt as to where the Democrat Party stands on the issue of abortion. It is even considered to be a “woman’s health issue” by them and groups such as the Little Sisters of the Poor have already been sued. Who may be next? There is absolutely NO reason to believe this political party will change its stance under Mrs. Clinton. In fact, religious freedoms will probably only continue to be infringed upon if the next Supreme Court Justice appointed is liberal, which undoubtedly he or she would be. Will the Homilies given by our priests at Mass eventually fall under the crime of “hate speech?” It’s a distinct and frightening possibility. I realize that Mr. Trump is not an ideal candidate, but at least the Republican platform does not promote as its official mantra abortion, same sex marriage and a move to suppress religious freedom. There is a good chance some of these evils may be stopped if Trump is elected. As a practicing Catholic for 56 years, I see no struggle at all as to whom I should vote for. That Catholic priests are arguing that Mrs. Clinton and the Democratic platform are somehow worthy of our regard just leaves me confused and very disappointed. Thank you.
I agree with much of what the Archbishop said except I don’t think he should have said “a lot people” think Clinton should be indicted and “a lot of people” think it was Orwellian she was not. Is he saying this is what he thinks himself? Because a lot people think a lot things they shouldn’t. She was investigated by the FBI and they declined to indict. Is the Archbishop saying he thinks our law enforcement system is rigged? If he does believe there was inappropriate favoritism in the case of Clinton, he should lay out his facts for the basis of his belief. If he does not believe that law enforcement acted inappropriately, he should perhaps rephrase what he said. Donald Trump has been making a lot of reckless allegations this campaign ,the rest of us need to be careful we don’t fall into that pattern as well.
Outside my son Archbishop Chaput is my most admired Catholic priest but he, like many, deep thinkers just dont get it. This election is the most important event in American democracy since 1860.
One candidate is disciple of the culture of death an enabler for sexual abuse of women a agent of the enemies the United States and a defender of Islamic terrorist and a communist
The other will protect religious freedom for all, protect our borders, bring back meaningful employment and kill the enemies who want to kill us.
And lastly it was the USCCB who shamed Catholics into voting for Obama by equating the murder of innocent babies to racial preference.
Where is anything said about voting for someone who believes abortion is correction. I believe as a Catholic voting for such a person is a sin.
If I was in a queue, waiting to be conceived, methinks I would take my chances with Donald Trump….
Very nice comment. I like that and will use it often.
If people haven’t realized it yet – what a wonderful church we have – our beloved Archbishop is always right on! I’m so proud to be a Catholic, to have the privilege of living within the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (I thank God for choosing this area for me.) Whenever I start feeling a little blue – I know God chose our Church leaders and I know I can listen and be guided by the Holy Spirit to listen to Archbishop Chaput and receive truth and guidance! Thank you for always allowing the light of Jesus to shine through you. God Bless You.
There is no election dilemma, and our clergy should not preach it as such. Morality should be the strongest issue, and the Democrat party, and Presidential Nominee, are blatantly opposed to the strong moral planks of the conservative Republicans. There should be no statement that one preserves one’s comfortable conscience, while leaving the top election slot empty. Our way of life will pass into History, as we stand aside, with mouths open, claiming “I didn’t vote for that”. Failure to vote ” no” is a vote “For”!
Accepting the Bishop’s observation that both major candidates have significant flaws, at the end of the day one must make a choice. We are deceiving ourselves to think that only voting for down ballot candidates; voting for a less objectionable third party candidate; or piously withholding our vote for any presidential candidate, are morally acceptable alternatives. Those options will ultimately favor or disfavor the Democratic or Republican candidate. One must make a logical choice. One candidate is highly problematic in many ways but has promised to nominate candidates like the late Justice Scalia and current Justice Thomas. He has promised to defend the lives of the unborn. The other candidate favors unlimited abortion rights including late term abortions. She would continue the relentless attack on religious freedom, especially Catholic orthopraxis. She epitomizes the belief held by many that we are no longer a constitutional republic but we are morphing into an oligarchy of criminal enterprises masked by identity politics and media cheerleaders. Sometimes we Catholic voters are presented with the dilemma of choosing the better from two good candidates. Sometimes we choose between a clearly good and a clearly bad candidate. This year, sadly, we must choose between two flawed candidates. If the Republican candidate is elected, we will have Supreme Court justices who will likely reverse or severely limit Roe v. Wade and uphold reasonable restrictions and health standards for abortion clinics. Think of the unborn who will live and not be slaughtered in the womb if these types of justices are in the bench for the next 3 or 4 decades. If the Democratic candidate is elected, much of Catholic teaching will be viewed as “hate” speech and restrictions slowly and inexorably ratcheted down on Cardinals, Bishops and priests. Churches will lose their tax exempt status if they fail to protect “gender diversity” and “women’s health” issues. The Hyde Amendment will be rescinded. The slaughter of the unborn will continue and Planned Parenthood will receive federal funds to partner with assisted suicide and abortion abattoirs to harvest body parts to sell to the 1% that can afford them. Crony capitalism, or Solyndra for the baby killers, will take on a new evil twist. And we will have such Justices and such evil for many decades. Catholics of all people (except those ilk who are personally opposed to abortion but support a woman’s right to kill her child) should understand what is at stake.
George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ was written as a warning, but too many have embraced it as an instruction manual.
I welcome Arch-Bishop Chaput’s words, his call to prayer and reflection, as well as his desire to support Catholics in their decision. What concerns me, though, is whether a Catholic can become a national politician without sacrificing their faith. As Governor Mario Cuomo explained, he had to do as he was elected instead of his conscience.He was elected to represent the people, he was not elected as their Catholic leader. In other words, he was elected for what he would do politically first and then secondarily what he would do religiously, to the extent that his religion informed his politics.
How far does religion influence politics for the understanding of politics, as least since the Enlightenment, was to separate religion from politics so that the implicit religion was a civil one, the public morality that bound all citizens to the regime.
I, too, struggle with the choice for neither candidate is appealing. I have found that since 2008 no candidate has offered a policy platform or a message that has given me cause to cast my ballot.
I could vote on the basis that one of the candidates will do less evil than the other, they support abortion yet do it with little enthusiasm. However, that only allows us to die slowly for the evil remains.Perhaps prudence requires that we work to change society by changing the context slowly over time. In this we might be guided in our choice,yet that requires a fused effort to achieve justice as understood through Catholic Social Teaching.
In the end, what may matter more than our vote is what we do with our daily choices, thoughts, and words for these will shape the political context more than a vote.
Thank you for your prayerful thoughts. This election is important, but something that we as Catholics need to realize more than ever is that we can’t look for our “king” in this election. What we are looking for is someone who will let us obey Our King and live accordingly. This election will affect 40 years, not 10, due to the Supreme Court situation. It is an election that will surely make a difference for us as Catholics.
I wish you were on the ticket…
Saint John Paul II: “WOE,WOE TO YOU AMERICA IF YOU DO NOT
DEFEAT THE CULTURE OF DEATH”
WOE, probably the most ominous word in Holy Scripture.
Take note, two WOES.
Why do you think Mike Pence is a Roman Catholic? He was RAISED a RC but left the church years ago – he even is quoted as saying, “I consider myself and evangelical Protestant”.
Vice President Joseph Biden USED to say, “I lost my wife and two daughters in the accident – my daughter who was two and my unborn daughter”. He no longer says that – guess it isn’t acceptable by his president and his party.
Mr.Trump has made it possible for many thousands of people to have work and has worked hard himself his entire life, raised beautiful productive children, and is running because he unabashedly loves this country and hates the way our culture and our Constitution are being ignored and destroyed while good citizens of the USA can’t get jobs. There is no need to ponder who will be the best President for our great country. Please get informed on the truth.
And then we have the Republican candidate for vice-president who sees the Catholic faith as deficit or lacking in the potential for full growth as a Christian.
I must say that no one in the clergy should be making any character evaluations of either candidate. As far as the teachings of the church, neither one should be considered as a viable candidate. I fear one and distrust the other. So what are we to do? Should I vote my conscience, as the Holy Spirit is leading me? Or should I vote your conscience, or the conscience of another prelate who disagrees with you? We are in a no win situation and I directly blame certain “Catholic” politicians in the Republican party for playing politics rather than doing what is right and standing up for what they know is true. Had they actually done that, we would have a viable alternative.
God is the Lord of nations.He even punishes nations for their idolatry and rebellion.We need to repent to ward off His judgement..
“Neither is clearly better than the other” ?? With great respect Archbishop I truly believe this will mislead many many people.
Thank you for so eloquently and precisely stating what I have been struggling to articulate.
I find this a bit troubling and over the line in re-litigating Hillary Clinton’s e-mail issue, stating “again, in the opinion of a lot of people”, is bizarre, that she should be indicted. Even if he is expressing the opinion of other people, to what end? If a member of the clergy had been legally cleared of any wrong doing in any manner of criminal act, is it fair to then say “Yes, but he really should be in jail, he’s guilty”, questioning a person’s innocence without presentation of facts available to a prosecutor is morally correct? Moral clarity, not punditry, are what we look to in our Catholic leader’s. And to call into question their wealth is even more bizarre when you consider the reliability of a position in the clergy versus the average working person’s salary and benefits package.
In a time when clarity seems to have left the building as far as the political arena we all have an obligation to pray,study and come to a moment of reflection that leads to action and a vote. Thank you for the encouragement to pursue that path. Being Catholic challenges all of us to see with faith, live in hope and witness to truth, neverveasy but always required if we claim faith. Peace
This party is based explicitly on Catholic social teaching:
http://www.solidarity-party.org
I appreciate my brother in faith for his thoughts on the coming election. He seems to be in the same position as most thinking people (catholic or otherwise) concerning the two candidates at the top of the ticket of their parties. He may was well have identified both candidates, lest someone not be sure who he is referring to. One has for decades been a symbol of the power of money and the carnage which it causes, one example being Atlantic City, NJ. Mr Trump was there and did his damage long ago. Mrs. Clinton clearly has a problem with the truth, which might be indictable or not. On the other hand, she has no problem with supporting Planned Parenthood which is the most pro-choice lobby here or anywhere. So, what are we to do? Read books about conscience? We already know what we are faced with. A No vote at the top of the ticket is an option and one which all should consider.
Interesting reflection, & thank you for the references.
May I ask a couple questions? 1. Assuming the 6th paragraph refers to the catechism as “what the Catholic faith holds to be true”, does any dissent from any portion of it put one in the category of “[a]ny one else”, as used in the next paragraph? 2. Why the unnecessary “his” before “nature” in the 9th paragraph?
Thanks, again.
Thank you Archbishop. I think it fair to suggest that Catholics should be advised that the Clinton-Kane ticket is absolutely off limits in terms of voting for them. Unlike with Obama we know that Clinton is joined at the hip to Planned Parenthood. Her commitment to abortion promotion and her willingness to attack traditional Christian morality and Institutions is obvious. With Kane we have someone claiming to be a devout Catholic and then using his position of power to directly undermine the right to life and traditional marriage definition. It is an outrageous public scandal that he isn’t being publicly rebuked by the Hierarchy. Are we not concerned with misleading the little ones any more? The Bishops should not endorse Trump but at minimum they must make clear that voting for Clinton-Kane with their public commitment to anti-Catholic, anti-Life policies, would be a sinful cooperation. Without this clarity from the Hierarchy it is no surprise that 60% of weekly Mass attending Catholics are planning on voting for Clinton and Kane is getting wild applause at his home parish. I think our Bishops are lacking courage in trying to appear non partisan above more pressing concerns. The head of the Knights of Columbus has shown more backbone than our Bishops and our Pope. This is a painful observation to report.
Strange that the Archbishop equates the behavior of a candidate who is racist, pro-torture, anti-immigration, twice-divorced and opposed to religious equality with another candidate who has been a faithful wife and mother, who has never been indicted or charged with a crime, even though the Archbishop says “in the view of a lot of people” she should be under indictment. Sure, in the view of those nativists who chant “lock her up” when prompted. Does the Archbishop count himself as one of those?
Cardinal Burke has called for a 54-day rosary novena for the nation beginning Aug. 15 an ending Oct. 7. In the end, her Immaculate Heart will triumph.
Thank you, once again, for a thought provoking article. I share similar thinking with some of the previous comments. Your messages are clearly written and reader friendly. God bless.
One of the candidates clearly set on abortion,
One promises “not,” and will seek advice from knowledgeable , upright people in areas of expertise that is not familiar. …..and has already listed Supreme Court possibilities that are pro life. If true to his word, this is of utmost importance.
I’m praying, (have been ,) that humility and wisdom, and any gifts the Holy Spirit will bestow for the sake of our Country, will be given to our President.
I believe our Lord will make virtue available, and with the grace of God , it will be accepted by the nominee, and Gods will, will be done. He has taken stranger sinners and made them Saints. May He have Mercy on us.
As a life-long practicing Catholic (70 yrs.) my line in the sand is ABORTION. We have one presidential candidate that supports abortion and Planned Parenthood. We
can only be either pro life or pro death. As for me and my house, we choose life.
Just a little confused. With Hillary Clinton’s strong stance on Abortion and her full support of Planned Parenthood, you are telling us that neither choice is clearly better than the other? I am sorry. I can clearly see a better choice.
I have yet to read a more clear, concise, and accurate picture of this years presidential election cycle. I will most definitely share this article not only with my friends in the ‘mobocracy’ (love this word!!!) of social media, but with my local paper’s editorial staff. And I would ask that we ask our respective churches around this nation to consider printing in their bulletins select portions of Mary Eberstadts’ book before election day.
With all due respect Archbishop, I thought as a Catholic our only choice , unfortunately, is to vote for Trump! Mrs. Clinton is pro-choice, pro-planned parenthood , pro marriage between anybody , and will ultimately put all LIBERAl supreme court justices. I seriously don’t understand why the catholic church does not promote this where as all my protestant/ christian group friends / pastors are ALL supporting and promoting not voting for Mrs. Clinton because of her liberal views.
I have to choose the candidate from the party that has not fully embraced abortion, gender theory, false marriage, and eroding religious freedom.
So very eloquent!! Thank you for your sound advice. Yes, this vote is so very important as well as mind-boggling. Prayer is always the answer!
With greatest respect for His Excellency, I cannot see why it is difficult for Catholics to choose between the two major party candidates.
Trump and the Republicans are the obvious choice for all who don’t want to see the advance of the anti-life/anti-family/anti-religious freedom agenda. What could be simpler?
And, so, dear brothers and sisters, let us all take a deep breath, follow our consciences and vote for Donald Trump, because the alternative is unthinkable. Amen.
“…..in the view of a lot of people” ? Sounds just like the billionaire candidate when he slanders people. Of the many issues with which one could be generally critical, why malign like that?
Not just.
The American Church, or maybe even the worldwide Church given what happens here impacts everyone, should officially organize/promote three days of prayer, fasting, and Eucharistic Adoration. It would be a tremendous witness to the world and a great way to turn lemons into lemonade…after all, it is the conversion and salvation of souls that we seek over all else.
Andromedaregina, Father Zuhlsdorf (website—-wdtprs) has called for a 54-Day Rosary Novena for our country, to start August 15, the Feast of the Assumption. Many of his readers, me included, are planning to join in that novena. It is VERY, VERY powerful. Please join us.
I wholeheartedly agree with andromedaregina. I have been wondering this past year why the Church hasn’t implemented prayer, fasting and Eucharistic Adoration in all of our Churches. Maybbe if we had, we would have been given a better choice for Presidential candidate!
Brother,
Thank you for your thoughts on this timely subject. Fortunately, one has a few months to read tge documents you recommend. If tou have links for these items, please forward them.
Best regards,
Michael
I am concerned about the direction of our nation, and most concerned about keeping Clinton from destroying the Pro-Life movement for decades through her Supreme Court Appointments. It strikes me as ironic that Clinton’s supporters claim she has dedicated her life to children’s health and well being. However, that applies only to those babies who made it to full-term birth.
Mr Kaine is a Catholic in name only. He doesn’t support “abortion”. He supports “a woman’s right to choose”. Doesn’t that sound so much softer and more palatable? Who could be opposed to “a woman’s right to choose”?
Please keep praying for all of us regular folks. I’m so glad you mentioned that prayer is much more than mumbling a Hail Mary. If I didn’t know that before, I learned that at Malvern over my years in Bucks County.
Thank you for your service to my Philadelphia Archdiocese. I’ll always call it home. God Bless you.
Without a doubt this is one of the best pieces I have read on this site. By clearly and succinctly stating the situation now being experienced by most thinking people you make your presentation attractive and therefore more effective. By suggesting an educational path through readings and reflection you call people to a deeper and more honest engagement. By emphasizing genuine prayerful reflection you set the proper context for the serious Catholic voter..
Bravo!!! I’d like to get these books and pass them around. Wonderful message here for all voters. Thank you, Archbishop.
Very sad situation in our country!! Sad to say neither Vice Presidential people represent our Catholic faith! I pray God will lead our country in the right direction for leading our country!! Thank you Bishop Chaput for your thoughts in this situation! God bless you!!
As always the leader of the Catholic Church in Philadelphia is spot-on!! GOY Archbishop Chaput.
Episcopal ordination conferred upon you an indelible character, such that you can never step out of the person of the bishop and be just a citizen. You also cop to this reality when you use your column as Archbishop rather than the comments section of a webpage, for example. That said, are you not reading anything our Holy Father has written to inform your conscience this election season? Your Grace, I think moderate Catholics and citizens find that you have done more to contribute to the polarization of our Church and society than to alleviate it. You are a good man and a steadfast leader, so please accept these comments with all due respect.
THANK YOU so much for writing this. You might not believe this, but your thoughtful reflections brought me hope and some sense of peace. God bless!
As always, Archbishop Chaput’s courageous, simple and honest words are an inspiration for all disciples living in the U.S.A. Thank you!
Whether you agree or disagree with Philadelphia’s arch bishop it is clear that he has broadly crossed the line between politics and religion that enables his church to remain a tax free entity in our nation. It is clear that when religious leaders publicly promote their agenda in regard to lawmaking (statute of limitations on sexual violations) and national elections (expressing their personal opinion about certain candidates) it is time for our legislators to rescind their tax free status! If the archbishop wishes to engage in politics, let his church pay the price for this meddling: let them contribute to the coffers of all local, state and federal organizations that all citizens are expected to. Let them pay property taxes on their enormous land and properly holdins in our nation, or let them remain mute and desist in all political lobbying and influence peddling.