WASHINGTON (CNS) — Catholic Relief Services said that $5.3 million in emergency funding it provided to the humanitarian organization CARE in 2010 under a U.S. government grant did not violate Catholic teaching.
In postings on its website July 20 and July 24, the U.S. bishops’ international development and relief agency explained that the money it provided to CARE was specifically used for water, sanitation and food and nutrition programs for poor families in Central America and Africa and could not be transferred to other services that CARE provided.
The postings came in response to an online report that CARE provides contraceptives to women and other family planning services.
[hotblock]
John-Henry Westen, editor of LifeSiteNews and author of the article criticizing CRS’s decision to work with CARE, stood by the story.
In particular, he pointed to the findings of John Haas, president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center in Philadelphia and a consultant to the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, who said the distribution of funds to CARE could pose risk of “scandal.”
Haas, however, also told CRS after the grant to CARE was awarded that none of the grants in question that the Catholic agency made to partnering organizations constituted support of or involvement in immoral activities.
Westen told Catholic News Service July 25 that Haas “took no exception to the story. He confirmed his quotes were accurate and only asked that the headline be changed.”
CRS said in a posting on its website July 25 that Haas asked LifeSiteNews to revise its headline on the report because it incorrectly said he advised the agency not to fund CARE.
CRS also said the report, which made its way to several websites, contained “inaccurate and scurrilous accusations.”
“CRS is not in agreement with CARE’s policy on contraception because we do not support any positions that would be in violation of Catholic teaching on human dignity and the sanctity of human life,” the church relief agency said in an updated posting July 24.
“Any funding Catholic Relief Services provides to CARE or any other international humanitarian organization comes from an outside source such as the federal government or a foundation, for a specific project, and has strict restrictions on its use,” the posting said.
“The grant in question with CARE was used to provide vitally needed food, clean water, sanitation services and basic nutrition programs to desperately poor families in Zimbabwe, Madagascar and five countries in Central America. Make no mistake about it, these programs are saving lives,” the posting continued.
John Rivera, director of communications at CRS, declined further comment on the postings.
“The statement stands by itself,” Rivera said.
The funding to CARE is outlined in a 2010 tax form CRS filed with the Internal Revenue Service. It outlines the agency’s income and expenses including grants to partnering organizations.
CRS said July 20 that it vetted its partnerships with CARE and other organizations in 2011 with Haas. The agency said the center’s review concluded:
* None of the grants to partnering organizations constituted support of or involvement in immoral activities.
* There is “little to no risk” of grant funds being used for programs outside of the grant request or for freeing up money at the receiving organization for immoral purposes.
* There could be a risk of “scandal over such partnerships if people become confused and wrongly assume that CRS was endorsing a partner’s position on other issues.”
CRS explained that it continues to work with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the bioethics center to address such risk.
Officials at CARE referred inquiries to CRS.
LifeSiteNews, launched in September 1997, is a nonprofit Internet service “dedicated to issues of culture, life, and family.” In the “About” section on its website, it says the purpose of its reports “is to provide balance and more accurate coverage on culture, life and family matters than is usually given by other media.” Westen is one of its co-founders.
Contributing to this story was Daniel Linskey.
PREVIOUS: Faith-based AIDS workers defend efforts at White House meeting
NEXT: Bishop says ‘false hearsay’ linking him to claim hurts diocese, family
I think the extreme pro-lifers of Life Site News undermine the movement. it It is just silly to say that as Catholics we can’t interface with other people and organizations who use birth control. It is absurd to assert we can’t support wonderful charities because those charities also support contraception with financing from other sources
After I heard that LifeSite News was going after CRS, I wrote CRS a check.