My column this week is a collection of personal comments. Read it as thoughts from a brother in the faith, not as teachings from an archbishop.
Presidential campaigns typically hit full stride after Labor Day in an election year. But 2016 is a year in which two prominent Catholics – a sitting vice president, and the next vice presidential nominee of his party — both seem to publicly ignore or invent the content of their Catholic faith as they go along. And meanwhile, both candidates for the nation’s top residence, the White House, have astonishing flaws.
This is depressing and liberating at the same time. Depressing, because it’s proof of how polarized the nation has become. Liberating, because for the honest voter, it’s much easier this year to ignore the routine tribal loyalty chants of both the Democratic and Republican camps. I’ve been a registered independent for a long time and never more happily so than in this election season. Both major candidates are – what’s the right word? so problematic – that neither is clearly better than the other.
As Forbes magazine pointed out some months ago, the Republican candidate is worth roughly $4.5 billion. The Democratic candidate is worth roughly $45 million. Compare that with the average American household, which is worth about $144,000. The median U.S. income is about $56,000. Neither major candidate lives anywhere near the solar system where most Americans live, work and raise families. Nonetheless, we’re asked to trust them.
[hotblock]
That’s a big ask. One candidate — in the view of a lot of people — is an eccentric businessman of defective ethics whose bombast and buffoonery make him inconceivable as president. And the other – in the view of a lot of people – should be under criminal indictment. The fact that she’s not – again, in the view of a lot of people — proves Orwell’s Animal Farm principle that “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
So what are we to do this election cycle as Catholic voters? Note that by “Catholic,” I mean people who take their faith seriously; people who actually believe what the Catholic faith holds to be true; people who place it first in their loyalty, thoughts and actions; people who submit their lives to Jesus Christ, to Scripture and to the guidance of the community of belief we know as the Church.
Anyone else who claims the Catholic label is simply fooling himself or herself — and even more importantly, misleading others.
The American bishops offer valuable counsel in their document Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (available from the USCCB), and this year especially, they ask us to pray before we vote. This is hardly new “news.” Prayer is always important. In a year when each Catholic voter must choose between deeply flawed options, prayer is essential. And prayer involves more than mumbling a Hail Mary before we pull the voting booth lever for someone we see as the lesser of two evils. Prayer is a conversation, an engagement of the soul with God. It involves listening for God’s voice and educating our consciences.
It’s absurd – in fact, it’s blasphemous – to assume that God prefers any political party in any election year. But God, by his nature, is always concerned with good and evil and the choices we make between the two. For Catholics, no political or social issue stands in isolation. But neither are all pressing issues equal in foundational importance or gravity. The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.
[hotblock2]
God created us with good brains. It follows that he will hold us accountable to think deeply and clearly, rightly ordering the factors that guide us, before we act politically. And yet modern American life, from its pervasive social media that too often resemble a mobocracy, to the relentless catechesis of consumption on our TVs, seems designed to do the opposite. It seems bent on turning us into opinionated and distracted cattle unable to gain mastery over our own appetites and thoughts. Thinking and praying require silence, and the only way we can get silence is by deciding to step back and unplug.
This year, a lot of good people will skip voting for president but vote for the “down ticket” names on their party’s ballot; or vote for a third party presidential candidate; or not vote at all; or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates. I don’t yet know which course I’ll personally choose. It’s a matter properly reserved for every citizen’s informed conscience.
But I do know a few of the things I’ll be reading between now and November. The list is not exclusive or comprehensive. But this year these particular titles seem especially urgent:
- Living the Gospel of Life. This 1998 pastoral letter of the U.S. bishops remains the best brief guide to American Catholic political reflection yet produced.
- Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society by R.R. Reno (Regnery) and It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies by Mary Eberstadt (HarperCollins). Both of these books are new, important, a key to understanding the current moment in our national life, and deeply engaging. They need to be discussed and shared widely.
- And finally two essays by the late, great Czech writer, Václav Havel, “Politics and Conscience” and “The Power of the Powerless.” Both are collected in Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 (Vintage Books). Havel was not (to my knowledge) a religious believer, and he wrote as a dissident during an era of Soviet Bloc repression. But his commitment to what he called “living in the truth,” and his understanding and critique of the weaknesses in Western societies like our own – not just Marxist ones – were remarkable. They remain relevant right now, today.
The next few months will determine the next decade and more of our nation’s life. We need to be awake, we need to clear our heads of media noise, and we need to think quietly and carefully before we vote. None of us can afford to live the coming weeks on autopilot.
PREVIOUS: The Court, the House, and the elections ahead
NEXT: Some additional thoughts — and the elephant in the room
George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ was written as a warning, but too many have embraced it as an instruction manual.
I welcome Arch-Bishop Chaput’s words, his call to prayer and reflection, as well as his desire to support Catholics in their decision. What concerns me, though, is whether a Catholic can become a national politician without sacrificing their faith. As Governor Mario Cuomo explained, he had to do as he was elected instead of his conscience.He was elected to represent the people, he was not elected as their Catholic leader. In other words, he was elected for what he would do politically first and then secondarily what he would do religiously, to the extent that his religion informed his politics.
How far does religion influence politics for the understanding of politics, as least since the Enlightenment, was to separate religion from politics so that the implicit religion was a civil one, the public morality that bound all citizens to the regime.
I, too, struggle with the choice for neither candidate is appealing. I have found that since 2008 no candidate has offered a policy platform or a message that has given me cause to cast my ballot.
I could vote on the basis that one of the candidates will do less evil than the other, they support abortion yet do it with little enthusiasm. However, that only allows us to die slowly for the evil remains.Perhaps prudence requires that we work to change society by changing the context slowly over time. In this we might be guided in our choice,yet that requires a fused effort to achieve justice as understood through Catholic Social Teaching.
In the end, what may matter more than our vote is what we do with our daily choices, thoughts, and words for these will shape the political context more than a vote.
Thank you for your prayerful thoughts. This election is important, but something that we as Catholics need to realize more than ever is that we can’t look for our “king” in this election. What we are looking for is someone who will let us obey Our King and live accordingly. This election will affect 40 years, not 10, due to the Supreme Court situation. It is an election that will surely make a difference for us as Catholics.
I wish you were on the ticket…
Saint John Paul II: “WOE,WOE TO YOU AMERICA IF YOU DO NOT
DEFEAT THE CULTURE OF DEATH”
WOE, probably the most ominous word in Holy Scripture.
Take note, two WOES.
Why do you think Mike Pence is a Roman Catholic? He was RAISED a RC but left the church years ago – he even is quoted as saying, “I consider myself and evangelical Protestant”.
Vice President Joseph Biden USED to say, “I lost my wife and two daughters in the accident – my daughter who was two and my unborn daughter”. He no longer says that – guess it isn’t acceptable by his president and his party.
Mr.Trump has made it possible for many thousands of people to have work and has worked hard himself his entire life, raised beautiful productive children, and is running because he unabashedly loves this country and hates the way our culture and our Constitution are being ignored and destroyed while good citizens of the USA can’t get jobs. There is no need to ponder who will be the best President for our great country. Please get informed on the truth.
And then we have the Republican candidate for vice-president who sees the Catholic faith as deficit or lacking in the potential for full growth as a Christian.
I must say that no one in the clergy should be making any character evaluations of either candidate. As far as the teachings of the church, neither one should be considered as a viable candidate. I fear one and distrust the other. So what are we to do? Should I vote my conscience, as the Holy Spirit is leading me? Or should I vote your conscience, or the conscience of another prelate who disagrees with you? We are in a no win situation and I directly blame certain “Catholic” politicians in the Republican party for playing politics rather than doing what is right and standing up for what they know is true. Had they actually done that, we would have a viable alternative.
God is the Lord of nations.He even punishes nations for their idolatry and rebellion.We need to repent to ward off His judgement..
“Neither is clearly better than the other” ?? With great respect Archbishop I truly believe this will mislead many many people.
Thank you for so eloquently and precisely stating what I have been struggling to articulate.
I find this a bit troubling and over the line in re-litigating Hillary Clinton’s e-mail issue, stating “again, in the opinion of a lot of people”, is bizarre, that she should be indicted. Even if he is expressing the opinion of other people, to what end? If a member of the clergy had been legally cleared of any wrong doing in any manner of criminal act, is it fair to then say “Yes, but he really should be in jail, he’s guilty”, questioning a person’s innocence without presentation of facts available to a prosecutor is morally correct? Moral clarity, not punditry, are what we look to in our Catholic leader’s. And to call into question their wealth is even more bizarre when you consider the reliability of a position in the clergy versus the average working person’s salary and benefits package.
In a time when clarity seems to have left the building as far as the political arena we all have an obligation to pray,study and come to a moment of reflection that leads to action and a vote. Thank you for the encouragement to pursue that path. Being Catholic challenges all of us to see with faith, live in hope and witness to truth, neverveasy but always required if we claim faith. Peace
This party is based explicitly on Catholic social teaching:
http://www.solidarity-party.org
I appreciate my brother in faith for his thoughts on the coming election. He seems to be in the same position as most thinking people (catholic or otherwise) concerning the two candidates at the top of the ticket of their parties. He may was well have identified both candidates, lest someone not be sure who he is referring to. One has for decades been a symbol of the power of money and the carnage which it causes, one example being Atlantic City, NJ. Mr Trump was there and did his damage long ago. Mrs. Clinton clearly has a problem with the truth, which might be indictable or not. On the other hand, she has no problem with supporting Planned Parenthood which is the most pro-choice lobby here or anywhere. So, what are we to do? Read books about conscience? We already know what we are faced with. A No vote at the top of the ticket is an option and one which all should consider.
Interesting reflection, & thank you for the references.
May I ask a couple questions? 1. Assuming the 6th paragraph refers to the catechism as “what the Catholic faith holds to be true”, does any dissent from any portion of it put one in the category of “[a]ny one else”, as used in the next paragraph? 2. Why the unnecessary “his” before “nature” in the 9th paragraph?
Thanks, again.
Thank you Archbishop. I think it fair to suggest that Catholics should be advised that the Clinton-Kane ticket is absolutely off limits in terms of voting for them. Unlike with Obama we know that Clinton is joined at the hip to Planned Parenthood. Her commitment to abortion promotion and her willingness to attack traditional Christian morality and Institutions is obvious. With Kane we have someone claiming to be a devout Catholic and then using his position of power to directly undermine the right to life and traditional marriage definition. It is an outrageous public scandal that he isn’t being publicly rebuked by the Hierarchy. Are we not concerned with misleading the little ones any more? The Bishops should not endorse Trump but at minimum they must make clear that voting for Clinton-Kane with their public commitment to anti-Catholic, anti-Life policies, would be a sinful cooperation. Without this clarity from the Hierarchy it is no surprise that 60% of weekly Mass attending Catholics are planning on voting for Clinton and Kane is getting wild applause at his home parish. I think our Bishops are lacking courage in trying to appear non partisan above more pressing concerns. The head of the Knights of Columbus has shown more backbone than our Bishops and our Pope. This is a painful observation to report.
Strange that the Archbishop equates the behavior of a candidate who is racist, pro-torture, anti-immigration, twice-divorced and opposed to religious equality with another candidate who has been a faithful wife and mother, who has never been indicted or charged with a crime, even though the Archbishop says “in the view of a lot of people” she should be under indictment. Sure, in the view of those nativists who chant “lock her up” when prompted. Does the Archbishop count himself as one of those?
Cardinal Burke has called for a 54-day rosary novena for the nation beginning Aug. 15 an ending Oct. 7. In the end, her Immaculate Heart will triumph.
Thank you, once again, for a thought provoking article. I share similar thinking with some of the previous comments. Your messages are clearly written and reader friendly. God bless.