My column this week is a collection of personal comments. Read it as thoughts from a brother in the faith, not as teachings from an archbishop.
Presidential campaigns typically hit full stride after Labor Day in an election year. But 2016 is a year in which two prominent Catholics – a sitting vice president, and the next vice presidential nominee of his party — both seem to publicly ignore or invent the content of their Catholic faith as they go along. And meanwhile, both candidates for the nation’s top residence, the White House, have astonishing flaws.
This is depressing and liberating at the same time. Depressing, because it’s proof of how polarized the nation has become. Liberating, because for the honest voter, it’s much easier this year to ignore the routine tribal loyalty chants of both the Democratic and Republican camps. I’ve been a registered independent for a long time and never more happily so than in this election season. Both major candidates are – what’s the right word? so problematic – that neither is clearly better than the other.
As Forbes magazine pointed out some months ago, the Republican candidate is worth roughly $4.5 billion. The Democratic candidate is worth roughly $45 million. Compare that with the average American household, which is worth about $144,000. The median U.S. income is about $56,000. Neither major candidate lives anywhere near the solar system where most Americans live, work and raise families. Nonetheless, we’re asked to trust them.
[hotblock]
That’s a big ask. One candidate — in the view of a lot of people — is an eccentric businessman of defective ethics whose bombast and buffoonery make him inconceivable as president. And the other – in the view of a lot of people – should be under criminal indictment. The fact that she’s not – again, in the view of a lot of people — proves Orwell’s Animal Farm principle that “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
So what are we to do this election cycle as Catholic voters? Note that by “Catholic,” I mean people who take their faith seriously; people who actually believe what the Catholic faith holds to be true; people who place it first in their loyalty, thoughts and actions; people who submit their lives to Jesus Christ, to Scripture and to the guidance of the community of belief we know as the Church.
Anyone else who claims the Catholic label is simply fooling himself or herself — and even more importantly, misleading others.
The American bishops offer valuable counsel in their document Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (available from the USCCB), and this year especially, they ask us to pray before we vote. This is hardly new “news.” Prayer is always important. In a year when each Catholic voter must choose between deeply flawed options, prayer is essential. And prayer involves more than mumbling a Hail Mary before we pull the voting booth lever for someone we see as the lesser of two evils. Prayer is a conversation, an engagement of the soul with God. It involves listening for God’s voice and educating our consciences.
It’s absurd – in fact, it’s blasphemous – to assume that God prefers any political party in any election year. But God, by his nature, is always concerned with good and evil and the choices we make between the two. For Catholics, no political or social issue stands in isolation. But neither are all pressing issues equal in foundational importance or gravity. The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.
[hotblock2]
God created us with good brains. It follows that he will hold us accountable to think deeply and clearly, rightly ordering the factors that guide us, before we act politically. And yet modern American life, from its pervasive social media that too often resemble a mobocracy, to the relentless catechesis of consumption on our TVs, seems designed to do the opposite. It seems bent on turning us into opinionated and distracted cattle unable to gain mastery over our own appetites and thoughts. Thinking and praying require silence, and the only way we can get silence is by deciding to step back and unplug.
This year, a lot of good people will skip voting for president but vote for the “down ticket” names on their party’s ballot; or vote for a third party presidential candidate; or not vote at all; or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates. I don’t yet know which course I’ll personally choose. It’s a matter properly reserved for every citizen’s informed conscience.
But I do know a few of the things I’ll be reading between now and November. The list is not exclusive or comprehensive. But this year these particular titles seem especially urgent:
- Living the Gospel of Life. This 1998 pastoral letter of the U.S. bishops remains the best brief guide to American Catholic political reflection yet produced.
- Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society by R.R. Reno (Regnery) and It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies by Mary Eberstadt (HarperCollins). Both of these books are new, important, a key to understanding the current moment in our national life, and deeply engaging. They need to be discussed and shared widely.
- And finally two essays by the late, great Czech writer, Václav Havel, “Politics and Conscience” and “The Power of the Powerless.” Both are collected in Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 (Vintage Books). Havel was not (to my knowledge) a religious believer, and he wrote as a dissident during an era of Soviet Bloc repression. But his commitment to what he called “living in the truth,” and his understanding and critique of the weaknesses in Western societies like our own – not just Marxist ones – were remarkable. They remain relevant right now, today.
The next few months will determine the next decade and more of our nation’s life. We need to be awake, we need to clear our heads of media noise, and we need to think quietly and carefully before we vote. None of us can afford to live the coming weeks on autopilot.
PREVIOUS: The Court, the House, and the elections ahead
NEXT: Some additional thoughts — and the elephant in the room
Thank you for this — and thank you, most particularly, for avoiding the simplistic, and therefore necessarily dishonest, reductions of the issues. I’m enormously grateful.
(from Raleigh, NC, Diocese)
Excellent reflection for the faithful Catholic to ponder in prayer. Helps support my homily this weekend on Luke’s “division” gospel. Take your anxiety to God in prayer. Listen for His answer. Perhaps it will be a question…’What would Jesus do?’
I highly doubt this will be published, how ever if there is any integrity in this journalistic publication, perhaps it will. An individual with the rock solid Catholic credentials but dubious Christian ones ought not dabble in politics. One only need to look to the events of the past decade to support this. If you want to preach politics from the pulpit, fine. Here is your tax bill. When paid in full, I’ll listen to your point of view. To compare Secretary ClintonTo Donald Trump is not only inaccurate, it’s intellectually lazy. This is not a decision between the lesser of two evils. It’s the decision between right and wrong. If you are basing that decision on the subject of abortion, stop the hypocrisy. Look at your flock and their record and opinion on the subject. Just stop. Enough.
With all due respect to the cardinal, I was disappointed in the Cardinals comments. He missed the opportunity to speak out clearly and specifically to Catholics about the articles of our faith that should be considered when voting. They are: the right to life at any stage of development; definition of marriage and the family; and protection of religious freedom which is under attack today. His comments and those of some of the leaders of the USCCB remind me of angels dancing on the head of a pin concerning these paramount political issues.
Such generalities hardly assist one in carefully discerning which candidate, in spite of personal flaws, actually holds positions that best accord with or who has expressed the intention of fulfilling principles which accord with subsidiarity and establishing true conditions that will encourage a culture of law and order as well as economic vitality which can encourage the stability and flourishing of families.
I should think this is more important than painting vague generalizations about dislikes of this or that personality flaws in a candidate.
The problem with saying both candidates are horrible really does nothing to show who the enemy of the Catholic church is. Trump has said concerning things ,but his actions are far more supportive to conservative principles including him saying he is the pro life candidate, which I hope is true. He said build a wall but he at least recognizes the legal system is necessary for safe and controlled immigration, he said put a stop to immigration from at risk countries which is temporary and common sense and has been done before multiple times. crassHillary on the other hand is blatantly on the record anti religious freedom, pro death, , pro murder,pro PC,pro illegal open border. Pro Machiavellian politics to enhance government growth and takeover and Exorbitant high taxes. Those who vote for such an extreme pro abortion person need to understand their own soul is in jeopardy voting for her. Furthermore she will elect judges that will drag this country further into a totalitarian style government reminiscent of communist / socialist regimes. ” Socialism, is communism” said Lenin, and the democratic parties platform is 99% based on big government and dictatorial societies.
So if you vote independent, or don’t vote, then your creating part of the problem. The two majors in the ballot will be trump and Clinton, everything else does not change this country or even Stave off the extreme liberal ideologies trampling the constitution as through the Obama term. Hillary is Obama 2.0 and far worse, their platform pushes the same agenda.
We need good conservative judges in place! We need leaders with tangible morals and values. Also almost 99% of all media is character assassinating Trump,you must ask why and how much is agenda driven lies.
“or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates…”
Despite the positive comments here, I find this article yet another disturbing sign that the Catholic establishment is going to assist the election of Hilda Beast by condoning abstention or useless third party voting, which is effectively a Catholic vote for Hillary. There is no “mysterious calculus” at work here. Trump promises to fill Supreme Court vacancies from a list of eleven judicial conservatives, and his running mate declares that Roe v. Wade must be consigned to the “ash heap of history.” Hillda Beast, on the other hand, will certainly nominate radical ideologues who favor abortion on demand and “gay marriage,” who will tyrannize American for at least another generation. Moreover, she is campaigning on a promise to provide government subsidized abortions, repealing the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits such funding.
What exactly is “mysterious” here? The Catholic choice is obvious: Trump. As for the “lesser of two evils” argument, every American election in living memory has presented the lesser of two evils. But Catholics who vote for Trump are not CHOOSING the lesser of two evils, but rather are mitigating harm to the common good without endorsing any position of Trump’s that might be at odds with Catholic teaching. The principle of double effect clearly applies.
A great article and a sage bit of advice by Archbishop Chaput! We are not here on Earth to judge one another. We need to forgive and try to get along. I find it nearly impossible to NOT judge these 2 candidates! One is an egomaniac unable to control his emotional thought. The other has a long trail of horrible abuses of power and dishonesty. Tough choice for sure. Prayer and deep thought will be our only chance to make a selection that is palatable. Thank you Archbishop!
Good insight, however, it is easy to decide what candidate we Catholics need. Think of the Supreme Court Judges that will be replaced!!!
What about the fact that American Bishops supported the Affordable Care Act, which has driven up healthcare costs, made insurance completely uneconomical, threatened religious liberty, and has resulted in the downturn of charitable contributions to parish collections. My own mother has had to cut back on how much she tithes because she has to pay 40% more in health insurance!
What do you or any Bishop have to say about your support of that law? I’m voting for Trump, he’s not perfect but Hillary Clinton is much worse.
As always – a thoughtful, practical, and faithful exhortation to Catholics and people of good faith. Thank you, your Excellency!
This is very confusing, to say the least. Not at all what we would expect from the normally clear-headed guidance from Archbishop Chaput. It is true that Mr. Trump is not any Catholic’s ideal of a presidential candidate. However, to make a general moral equivalent out of the two, without making distinctions regarding, inter alia, abortion, is misleading at best. Where is the real guidance we need in this election year regarding, say, the theological concept of Double Effect? Not to mention JP II’s emphasis on “limiting harm”? Roman Catholic voters need doctrinally sound assistance from our priests and bishops, not smug hand-wringing!
Archbishop, your column leaves me confused and depressed. You state that it is blasphemous to assume that God prefers one political party over the other yet you also point out that the right to life undergirds all other rights. There is no doubt as to where the Democrat Party stands on the issue of abortion. It is even considered to be a “woman’s health issue” by them and groups such as the Little Sisters of the Poor have already been sued. Who may be next? There is absolutely NO reason to believe this political party will change its stance under Mrs. Clinton. In fact, religious freedoms will probably only continue to be infringed upon if the next Supreme Court Justice appointed is liberal, which undoubtedly he or she would be. Will the Homilies given by our priests at Mass eventually fall under the crime of “hate speech?” It’s a distinct and frightening possibility. I realize that Mr. Trump is not an ideal candidate, but at least the Republican platform does not promote as its official mantra abortion, same sex marriage and a move to suppress religious freedom. There is a good chance some of these evils may be stopped if Trump is elected. As a practicing Catholic for 56 years, I see no struggle at all as to whom I should vote for. That Catholic priests are arguing that Mrs. Clinton and the Democratic platform are somehow worthy of our regard just leaves me confused and very disappointed. Thank you.
I agree with much of what the Archbishop said except I don’t think he should have said “a lot people” think Clinton should be indicted and “a lot of people” think it was Orwellian she was not. Is he saying this is what he thinks himself? Because a lot people think a lot things they shouldn’t. She was investigated by the FBI and they declined to indict. Is the Archbishop saying he thinks our law enforcement system is rigged? If he does believe there was inappropriate favoritism in the case of Clinton, he should lay out his facts for the basis of his belief. If he does not believe that law enforcement acted inappropriately, he should perhaps rephrase what he said. Donald Trump has been making a lot of reckless allegations this campaign ,the rest of us need to be careful we don’t fall into that pattern as well.
Outside my son Archbishop Chaput is my most admired Catholic priest but he, like many, deep thinkers just dont get it. This election is the most important event in American democracy since 1860.
One candidate is disciple of the culture of death an enabler for sexual abuse of women a agent of the enemies the United States and a defender of Islamic terrorist and a communist
The other will protect religious freedom for all, protect our borders, bring back meaningful employment and kill the enemies who want to kill us.
And lastly it was the USCCB who shamed Catholics into voting for Obama by equating the murder of innocent babies to racial preference.
Where is anything said about voting for someone who believes abortion is correction. I believe as a Catholic voting for such a person is a sin.
If I was in a queue, waiting to be conceived, methinks I would take my chances with Donald Trump….
Very nice comment. I like that and will use it often.
If people haven’t realized it yet – what a wonderful church we have – our beloved Archbishop is always right on! I’m so proud to be a Catholic, to have the privilege of living within the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (I thank God for choosing this area for me.) Whenever I start feeling a little blue – I know God chose our Church leaders and I know I can listen and be guided by the Holy Spirit to listen to Archbishop Chaput and receive truth and guidance! Thank you for always allowing the light of Jesus to shine through you. God Bless You.
There is no election dilemma, and our clergy should not preach it as such. Morality should be the strongest issue, and the Democrat party, and Presidential Nominee, are blatantly opposed to the strong moral planks of the conservative Republicans. There should be no statement that one preserves one’s comfortable conscience, while leaving the top election slot empty. Our way of life will pass into History, as we stand aside, with mouths open, claiming “I didn’t vote for that”. Failure to vote ” no” is a vote “For”!
Accepting the Bishop’s observation that both major candidates have significant flaws, at the end of the day one must make a choice. We are deceiving ourselves to think that only voting for down ballot candidates; voting for a less objectionable third party candidate; or piously withholding our vote for any presidential candidate, are morally acceptable alternatives. Those options will ultimately favor or disfavor the Democratic or Republican candidate. One must make a logical choice. One candidate is highly problematic in many ways but has promised to nominate candidates like the late Justice Scalia and current Justice Thomas. He has promised to defend the lives of the unborn. The other candidate favors unlimited abortion rights including late term abortions. She would continue the relentless attack on religious freedom, especially Catholic orthopraxis. She epitomizes the belief held by many that we are no longer a constitutional republic but we are morphing into an oligarchy of criminal enterprises masked by identity politics and media cheerleaders. Sometimes we Catholic voters are presented with the dilemma of choosing the better from two good candidates. Sometimes we choose between a clearly good and a clearly bad candidate. This year, sadly, we must choose between two flawed candidates. If the Republican candidate is elected, we will have Supreme Court justices who will likely reverse or severely limit Roe v. Wade and uphold reasonable restrictions and health standards for abortion clinics. Think of the unborn who will live and not be slaughtered in the womb if these types of justices are in the bench for the next 3 or 4 decades. If the Democratic candidate is elected, much of Catholic teaching will be viewed as “hate” speech and restrictions slowly and inexorably ratcheted down on Cardinals, Bishops and priests. Churches will lose their tax exempt status if they fail to protect “gender diversity” and “women’s health” issues. The Hyde Amendment will be rescinded. The slaughter of the unborn will continue and Planned Parenthood will receive federal funds to partner with assisted suicide and abortion abattoirs to harvest body parts to sell to the 1% that can afford them. Crony capitalism, or Solyndra for the baby killers, will take on a new evil twist. And we will have such Justices and such evil for many decades. Catholics of all people (except those ilk who are personally opposed to abortion but support a woman’s right to kill her child) should understand what is at stake.