My column this week is a collection of personal comments. Read it as thoughts from a brother in the faith, not as teachings from an archbishop.
Presidential campaigns typically hit full stride after Labor Day in an election year. But 2016 is a year in which two prominent Catholics – a sitting vice president, and the next vice presidential nominee of his party — both seem to publicly ignore or invent the content of their Catholic faith as they go along. And meanwhile, both candidates for the nation’s top residence, the White House, have astonishing flaws.
This is depressing and liberating at the same time. Depressing, because it’s proof of how polarized the nation has become. Liberating, because for the honest voter, it’s much easier this year to ignore the routine tribal loyalty chants of both the Democratic and Republican camps. I’ve been a registered independent for a long time and never more happily so than in this election season. Both major candidates are – what’s the right word? so problematic – that neither is clearly better than the other.
As Forbes magazine pointed out some months ago, the Republican candidate is worth roughly $4.5 billion. The Democratic candidate is worth roughly $45 million. Compare that with the average American household, which is worth about $144,000. The median U.S. income is about $56,000. Neither major candidate lives anywhere near the solar system where most Americans live, work and raise families. Nonetheless, we’re asked to trust them.
[hotblock]
That’s a big ask. One candidate — in the view of a lot of people — is an eccentric businessman of defective ethics whose bombast and buffoonery make him inconceivable as president. And the other – in the view of a lot of people – should be under criminal indictment. The fact that she’s not – again, in the view of a lot of people — proves Orwell’s Animal Farm principle that “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
So what are we to do this election cycle as Catholic voters? Note that by “Catholic,” I mean people who take their faith seriously; people who actually believe what the Catholic faith holds to be true; people who place it first in their loyalty, thoughts and actions; people who submit their lives to Jesus Christ, to Scripture and to the guidance of the community of belief we know as the Church.
Anyone else who claims the Catholic label is simply fooling himself or herself — and even more importantly, misleading others.
The American bishops offer valuable counsel in their document Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (available from the USCCB), and this year especially, they ask us to pray before we vote. This is hardly new “news.” Prayer is always important. In a year when each Catholic voter must choose between deeply flawed options, prayer is essential. And prayer involves more than mumbling a Hail Mary before we pull the voting booth lever for someone we see as the lesser of two evils. Prayer is a conversation, an engagement of the soul with God. It involves listening for God’s voice and educating our consciences.
It’s absurd – in fact, it’s blasphemous – to assume that God prefers any political party in any election year. But God, by his nature, is always concerned with good and evil and the choices we make between the two. For Catholics, no political or social issue stands in isolation. But neither are all pressing issues equal in foundational importance or gravity. The right to life undergirds all other rights and all genuine social progress. It cannot be set aside or contextualized in the name of other “rights” or priorities without prostituting the whole idea of human dignity.
[hotblock2]
God created us with good brains. It follows that he will hold us accountable to think deeply and clearly, rightly ordering the factors that guide us, before we act politically. And yet modern American life, from its pervasive social media that too often resemble a mobocracy, to the relentless catechesis of consumption on our TVs, seems designed to do the opposite. It seems bent on turning us into opinionated and distracted cattle unable to gain mastery over our own appetites and thoughts. Thinking and praying require silence, and the only way we can get silence is by deciding to step back and unplug.
This year, a lot of good people will skip voting for president but vote for the “down ticket” names on their party’s ballot; or vote for a third party presidential candidate; or not vote at all; or find some mysterious calculus that will allow them to vote for one or the other of the major candidates. I don’t yet know which course I’ll personally choose. It’s a matter properly reserved for every citizen’s informed conscience.
But I do know a few of the things I’ll be reading between now and November. The list is not exclusive or comprehensive. But this year these particular titles seem especially urgent:
- Living the Gospel of Life. This 1998 pastoral letter of the U.S. bishops remains the best brief guide to American Catholic political reflection yet produced.
- Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society by R.R. Reno (Regnery) and It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies by Mary Eberstadt (HarperCollins). Both of these books are new, important, a key to understanding the current moment in our national life, and deeply engaging. They need to be discussed and shared widely.
- And finally two essays by the late, great Czech writer, Václav Havel, “Politics and Conscience” and “The Power of the Powerless.” Both are collected in Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990 (Vintage Books). Havel was not (to my knowledge) a religious believer, and he wrote as a dissident during an era of Soviet Bloc repression. But his commitment to what he called “living in the truth,” and his understanding and critique of the weaknesses in Western societies like our own – not just Marxist ones – were remarkable. They remain relevant right now, today.
The next few months will determine the next decade and more of our nation’s life. We need to be awake, we need to clear our heads of media noise, and we need to think quietly and carefully before we vote. None of us can afford to live the coming weeks on autopilot.
PREVIOUS: The Court, the House, and the elections ahead
NEXT: Some additional thoughts — and the elephant in the room
I think your thoughts ring true with many. Perhaps God is reminding us that He is still on the throne, and that as Americans we have shifted our focus on trusting one man/woman to guide our country. Maybe as Christians we will remember to pray daily, for our country, our leaders, each other. I think hard times are ahead, either way. But Christ still rules.
If Hillary is allowed to create an extremist Supreme Court, you will find that the American Catholic world will come tumbling down. Every pro-life law on the books will be struck down. free public colleges will put Catholic schools out of business, and religious conscience rights will be the stuff of history books. I’m not so sure that God is neutral regarding political parties.
Think about the Supreme Court when voting: It’s a clear choice for me, who am thoroughly prolife: God help this nation if Clinton gets elected!
I thank you for this sobering reflection, very important for us to hear from a Catholic bishop. Both presidential candidates are indeed astonishingly flawed and problematic. However, one is a relentlessly aggressive and ambitious promoter of abortion, such that even if her stance on any other issue appealed to a genuinely Catholic voter, such a voter should be bound in conscience not to vote for her. Other voting options such as you mention remain open, but, at least in my view, not this one. Again, thank you, Excellency, for your reflection.
Many of your references predate the Pope’s instruction not to obsess on abortion. Will those sources be rewritten to reflect Francis’ position?
Trump is now anti-abortion and promises to repeal Johnson amendment.
No president can independently alter the laws regarding abortion. That has to be done through legislative and/or judicial processes and that is where those who have strong moral convictions either way can and must fight their fights. That issue aside, I think it would be irresponsible to vote for a candidate who is clearly incompetent by temperament as well as by lack of common sense or even common civility. I need not name names.
One of the flawed candidates will be the next President of the USA!
My not-so-mysterious calculus is:
* I will vote for the lesser of the two flawed candidates;
* I will vote for the one most likely top defend life from cradle to the grave;
* I will vote for the one most likely to defend my right to not just worship my
Faith, but my duty to practice my Faith;
* I will vote for the one who supports my right and duty to protect myself
and my family from unjust aggression;
* I well vote for the candidate most likely to appoint judges to the Supreme
Court who have judicial temperament and who are defenders of the
Constitution.
If as you say, Your Grace, the right to life undergirds all other rights, methinks “pulling the voting lever” in favour Donald Trump” must be the way to go….
Delighted to see a broader viewpoint than who is for unborn life- a too typical RC viewpoint and favoured too often by some Churchmen who damage the Church’s integrity and their independence as pastors. Teach us year round with your priests however butt out at election time
Some personal thoughts on your essay… It’s pretty surprising that you paint this false equivalency between the the two candidates and political parties. Only one party is responsible for the polarization by the constant chant of hate and fear from Fox News, and only one party selected an uneducated, racist, misogynistic, madman to be their candidate. Jesus would find this political party’s worship of the NRA and its weapons of death morally reprehensible.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput for an excellent letter. Let us conduct ourselves in an attitude of prayer toward those with whom we disagree and for ourselves as we seek to draw closer to God and to his people.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/births.htm
http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/
1 out of every 5 new Americans are exterminated. Far outnumbering deaths by terrorism, gun violence, etc. I will vote party line (Republican) Archbishop until the Democrats allows room for pro lifers or those who believe in the traditional definition of marriage.
Thank you for this thoughtful commentary, and most especially, thank you for your continuous courageous leadership and witness to our faith.
I will keep you in my prayers.
No common sense comments accepted?
Be aware that in 2009 Hillary Clinton proudly accepted the Planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger Award. Sanger viewed blacks as weeds that should be exterminated. She was a eugenicists. Recall that Bill Clinton vetoed the partial birth abortion ban. Senator Dole said that there was a fine line between partial-birth abortion and infanticide – something to ponder. Is there really any difference at all?
In August of 2015 Ministers Taking A Stand wrote to the Director of the The National Portrait Gallery Smithsonian Institution in DC and requested that the bust of the racist Sanger, who they stated spoke at the rallies of KKK women, be removed. Learn more about Sanger and her Negro Project.
History tells us that the eugenics movement was initiated by a group of liberal elites not only the U.S. but also in Europe, particularly in Germany. The movement was picking up popular support in those areas until the advent of WW II. The popularity of the eugenics movement quickly died because of the horror of the holocaust. Sanger who an eugenicist, was heavily involved early in the movement particularly in the southern part of the U.S. with the Negro population.
Planned Parenthood continues to suppress the growth of minority populations by locating 70% of its abortion facilities within or near black and Latino communities.
Donald Trump has not been a strong pro-lifer in the past however he is not the radical pro-abort that the Clintons have been. He has spoken saying he is now pro-life. The GOP Platform contains a strong Pro-Life plank thanks to Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum who resides in St. Louis, MO.
Years back when standing in the annual pro-life prayer chain our Associate Pastor commented that the most important social justice issue was abortion. He served at St. Clement of Rome in Des Peres, MO. His name is Fr. Nicholas Muenks.
Trump is certainly the better alternative!!! To vote third party will not accomplish anything. So I suggest you vote for the candidate who is not perfect but considerably better.
Thank you good Shepard!………..come Holy Spirit and renew the hearts of our Nation……
If only half, if not all, of the US Bishops, taught in the public forum, Americans would not be morally adrift. It is a pity that Abp. Chaput is writing as such that gets him such acclaim. It is the job of the Bishop, per Canon Law, to be the Shepherd. Yet, Americans, as sheep, smell pretty badly, which is to say their Bishops are AWOL
I am astounded that our Archbishop equates these two candidates in any way.
Trump is increasingly criticized for his incendiary and hateful speech, yet, continues to double down on his violent rhetoric.
Clinton embraces the downtrodden, not just in the US, but abroad, and seeks to bring more love and kindness to those in need.
I hope that our Archbishop will eventually distance himself from the vitriol and abuse emanating from Donald Trump and his campaign. Even the Holy Father sees the difference between the messages from these two candidates!
My vote goes to Trump. He presumably stands on the RNC platform, which is pro-life. After all, if one is put to death, all other issues become moot.
Thank you Archbishop, for directing all thinking Catholics and those not of the True Church, to some serious books and documents that will give us a thorough understanding of what our vote will do or not, by what we decide!!! Finally a voice of reason at this time of utter darkness….
So disappointed to hear you say both candidates are equally flawed. Hillary is a corrupt liar who has been in politics for over 40 years. She’s part of the elite cabal that wants complete dominion over all of us. Worst of all, she’s rabidly pro-choice, which is antithetical to Church teaching. Trump, on the other hand, is pro-life. Since you claim in your essay that respect for life is the #1 issue Catholics should consider, the choice is clear. Trump 2016.