“Never forget, when you hear the progress of the Enlightenment being praised, that the devil’s cleverest ploy is to persuade you that he doesn’t exist.”
— Charles Baudelaire
Leszek Kolakowski was an unusual man of letters. A fierce critic of the Church as a young man, he was a leading Marxist philosopher in Poland until he asked too many awkward questions about Soviet life under Stalin and got exiled to the West. He went on to become a fan of John Paul II and one of the great scholars of the last century.
Exactly 30 years ago, Kolakowski gave a lecture at Harvard entitled “The Devil in History.” Early in the talk, the mood in the room became restless. Many of the listeners knew Kolakowski’s work. They knew he could be playful and that he had a wicked sense of irony. But they couldn’t figure out where he was going with his lecture.
Present that day were the historians Tony Judt and Timothy Garton Ash. About 10 minutes into the talk, Ash leaned over to Judt and whispered incredulously: “I’ve got it. He really is talking about the devil.” And in fact, he was.[1]
[hotblock]
It was a moment when the little bigotries of our intellectual class were laid bare. Apart from Judt and Ash, the audience was baffled that an urbane public intellectual, fluent in five languages, could really believe in “religious nonsense” like the devil and original sin. But that’s precisely what Kolakowski did believe. And he said so again and again in his various works:
An example: “The devil is part of our experience. Our generation has seen enough of it for the message to be taken extremely seriously.”[2]
And: “Evil is continuous throughout human experience. The point is not how to make one immune to it, but under what conditions one may identify and restrain the devil.”[3]
And: “When a culture loses its sacred sense, it loses all sense.”[4]
Kolakowski saw that we can’t fully understand our culture unless we take the devil seriously. The devil and evil are constants at work in human history and in the struggles of every human soul. And note that Kolakowski (unlike some of our own Catholic leaders who should know better) was not using the word “devil” as a symbol of the darkness in our own hearts, or a metaphor for the bad things that happen in the world.
He was talking about the spiritual being Jesus called “the evil one” and “the father of lies” — the fallen angel who works tirelessly to thwart God’s mission and Christ’s work of salvation.
This is why the evangelization of culture is always, in some sense, a call to spiritual warfare. We’re in a struggle for souls. Our adversary is the devil. And while Satan is not God’s equal and doomed to final defeat, he can do bitter harm in human affairs. The first Christians knew this. We find their awareness written on nearly every page of the New Testament.
The modern world makes it hard to believe in the devil. But it treats Jesus Christ the same way. And that’s the point. Medieval theologians understood this quite well. They had an expression in Latin: Nullus diabolus, nullus redemptor.[5] No devil, no Redeemer. Without the devil, it’s very hard to explain why Jesus needed to come into the world to suffer and die for us. What exactly did he redeem us from?
[hotblock2]
The devil, more than anyone, appreciates this irony, i.e., that we can’t fully understand the mission of Jesus without him. And he exploits this to his full advantage. He knows that consigning him to myth inevitably sets in motion our same treatment of God.
So what’s the point of my column this week?
Jeffrey Russell, who wrote a remarkable four-volume history of the devil, noted that the Faust character is the most popular subject in Western paintings, poems, novels, operas, cantatas and films after the characters of Jesus, Mary and the devil himself.[6] That should tell us something. Who is Faust? He’s the man of letters who sells his soul to the devil on the promise that the devil will show him the secrets of the universe.
Faust is the “type” of a certain species of modern man; a certain kind of artist, scientist and philosopher. Faust doesn’t come to God’s creation as a seeker after truth, beauty, and meaning. He comes impatient to know, the better to control and dominate, with a delusion of his own entitlement, as if such knowledge should be his birthright. A prisoner of his own vanity, Faust would rather barter away his soul than humble himself before God.
There’s a lesson in Faust for our lives and for our culture. Without faith there can be no understanding, no knowledge, no wisdom. We need both faith and reason to penetrate the mysteries of creation and the mysteries of our own lives.
That’s true for individuals, and it’s true for nations. A culture that has a command of reason and the byproducts of reason — science and technology — but lacks faith has made a Faustian bargain with the (very real) devil that can only lead to despair and self-destruction. Such a culture has gained the world with its wealth, power and material success. But it has forfeited its soul.
***
[1] Tony Judt, “Leszek Kolakowski (1927-2009),” New York Review of Books, September 24, 2009
[2] Leszek Kolakowski, My Correct Views on Everything (South Bend, IN, St. Augustine’s Press, 2005), 133
[3] Ibid., 128
[4] Ibid., 271
[5] Jeffrey Burton Russell, Mephistopheles: The Devil in the Modern World (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1986), 33.
[6] Ibid., 58
Terrific. I am hoping to finish “Devout Life” ST. Francis De Sales. Love Paul
You are a great Bishop I will follow you where ever you go. Please do not take me off your e-mail. I live in New Jersey now but you are my favorite. I am reading St Francie De Sales “Devout Life” I would love to buy it. Love & prayers Paul
I think the Superior General of the Blackrobes needs to come to Philly and take a refresher course in theology from Archbishop Chaput. Well stated, your excellecy!
Read Father Gabrielle Amorth books and lives of Padre Pio and Gema Galgani.
A superb tour-de-force from Archbishop Chaput. Thank God for him, a man of faith and courage.
I must admit that I have not always been a “fan” of the Archbishop, however as a former history teacher, I can certainly appreciate the historical context of this message and I agree wholeheartedly with its conclusion. Amen, Archbishop. Amen
Wonderful clear message from Archbishop Chaput.
Thanks Archbishop and God Bless you!!!
Amen.
I need a pastor, and a bishop, who unafraid of speaking historically, with depth, and without risking self-implication of the “smoke of Satan” within the Church. Chaput was unwilling in the Synod on the Family to acknowledge the epidemic scourge of sexual abuse within families, perhaps because of a lack of moral standing in these matters in his beloved Church. The canard of enlightenment critique has served to protect the Church’s secrets. With due respect to this learned man and his admirers, it strikes me as violence to our God-given intellects to equate the enlightenment with satanic activity. The real problem is churchmen denying the activity of the devil in themselves.
Richard Rohr is not in the same league as Archbishop Chaput. Rohr’s liberal bias taints the Church’s theology.
So simplistically enlightening. I wanted more. Trying to gage the mindset of today’s population is a challenge. In my 73 years on this earth, working all of my adult life interacting with many sifferent people, I have never experienced such radicalization and hatred. Kruschev said he would bury our grandchildren, which he has. Only through prayer and push back will this type of behavior be redirected.
‘Never seen anything like it.’ Indeed, and it will get worse, if Bible prophecy means anything. 2 Tim 3:1-5
Thank you, Archbishop. This topic must be preached from the pulpit much more often. In some parishes, any mention of the devil greater than zero would be much more often. But that should not be surprising when even the head of the largest religious order considers the devil a figment of our imaginations. Ah, yes, we all know the passages from the Gospels when our Lord, after his baptism, is tempted by a “social construct” out in the desert. But then again, according to this esteemed leader within the Church, nobody was there with a video recorder to capture the real story. There is a certain age group of leadership within the Church that apparently went through seminary at a time when Holy Scripture was held as doubtful and in low regard. Fortunately, there has been a resurgence of great orthodox, traditional biblical scholarship on both the Catholic and Protestant fronts in recent years which will hopefully restore respect and confidence to the Word of God as the historical Truth that it is. We can all guess who was behind the many years of heretical “scholarship” which attempted to reduce the Bible to a few good moral tales, at best. It wasn’t just a “social construct,” that’s for sure.
Nailed it. Philadelphia got quite a gift from God when Father Chaput moved there from Denver.
I am going to meditate on those last three paragraphs at length. There’s more truth in them than a quick surface reading will reveal, I suspect.
To be sure the devil is very active in the world at all times. However it is man himself who commits sin i.,e original sin is not a myth either. Devil tempted Adam and Eve who sinned against the Will of God deliberately w/o reckoning the truth of what God told them, i.e, if the ate of the fruit of the tree pointed out to them, they would die. They preferred the devil’s version (You will not die) to Almighty God’s. Mary the Mother of Jesus Christ was pure just as Eve originally had been but Mary never sinned despite being just a human and undergoing many temptations to sin just as her Son Jesus Christ was tempted 3 times in the desert after his baptism by John the Baptist but never sinned. So yet devil IS active in this world but so IS GOD and HIS GRACE is enough for us to defend ourselves against the evil one. Problem arises when we fail to believe GOD and out of pride determine for ourselves (aided by suggestions from the devil) that GOD cannot be believed to our everlasting sorrow.
Thank you Archbishop Chaput, speaking clearly today that the devil is a real spiritual being is important. As you state, men have always been unwilling to humble themselves before GOD. Seems the head of the Jesuit order, Dr. Sosa, Does not believe in the devil as real. Many of his other recent comments would seem to fit “nullus diabolus, nullus redenptor”. His admiration for the Castro regime in Cuba. The lack of support by various oedinaries for appointing a exorcism for their diocese and not supporting the current priest exorcists. Reading an archived interview with Dr. Gabriel Amorth, was an awakening to how many within the Catholic Church do not feel a need for priest exorcists or exorcists and deliverance from the devil. The removal of exorcism from Rite of Baptism and the (my words) hurting of the Rite of Exorcism. If “Jesus Christ humbled Himself and became obedient….” So!! should we all humble ourselves before our GOD and fight the devil.
I am a 72 year old Catholic , loyal n faithful to mother church . However over the years like so many liberal Christians I don’t know if the devil exists in the same way tradition teaches . This article just seems the same . Obviously there is great evil on the world. But just to contrast Arch Chaput’s article with Richard Rohr’s theology is like looking at two different worlds . Rohr’s stuff makes so much sense to me , whilst Chaput’s doesn’t , with all due respect . Have you or anyone any helpful comments to make about my disbelief in the devil as tradionaly taught . ?
Denis, you have good questions. Your Archbishop’s essay answers most of them. Although he didn’t cite any scriptures, most of what he said is found there.
Since I’m not Catholic I’m not required to put any stock in RCC “tradition”, which I know is a big part of Church teaching. So be it; I will use the Bible.
Many sincere people have investigated Jesus. Some were Jews [psychologist Bruno Bettleheim and author Emil Ludwig], some were Protestants [Lutheran pastor Martin Niemoller], some were humanists [historians Will and Ariel Durant]. These and many others found that Jesus was a real person [attested by history] and a very good man. Bettleheim went so far as to say that Jesus was in excellent mental health. So when we read in Matthew 4 that he had a conversation with a devil [meaning slanderer] named Satan [meaning opposer], we must take the existence of both parties as fact. Let’s see if we can learn any thing practical from their chat.
Mt 4:3,4. We may be in discomfort or pain because of serving God but we must still look to his word for guidance.
Mt 5:5-7. We may have some superior quality of intellect or speech that impresses people, but we use it best in God’s service, not to seek acclaim. And note Satan’s good [but not complete] application of the prophecy at Ps 91:10-12. His intelligence is not to be underestimated.
Mt 4:8-10. The world has many pleasurable things to offer, but we must not test God’s support of us even by sampling them – as Adam did. [‘What? The death penalty for stealing one fruit?’ No. It was for disobeying his creator.]
Finally, note that Jesus was one-on-one with his and his father’s toughest opponent. Did he prevail because of his great intelligence or strength? No. He did so by using the word of God, the same resource we have. And there was nothing “liberal” about it; strictly God’s word.
I encourage you to keep learning more about Yahweh and his son. John 17:3.
Read Ephesians 6.
Read Fr. Gabrielle Amorth books.
Read Fr. Sante Babolin books.
Read Fr. Francesco Bamonte books (he is the current president of the International Exorcists Association).
Read Moira Noonan testimony in her book “Ransomed from Darkness”
Read “The Rite: the making of a modern exorcist”by Fr. Matt Baglio
And finally: read the lives of Saints, specially those who have been granted vissions of hell like Teresa of Avila, Maria Agreda, Faustina Kowalska, and of those who have confronted him directly like Padre Pio of Petrelcina, Gema Galgani, Joseph Cupertino.
If you read Italian visit the International Association of Exocists webpage.
You will be in my prayers.
Doug says ‘Since I’m not Catholic I’m not required to put any stock in RCC “tradition”, which I know is a big part of Church teaching. So be it; I will use the Bible.”
We Catholics will use the Bible as well, Doug. That is the 72 book Canon that has existed since 405 AD and which, unlike your version of Scripture, is unabridged, unedited and not corrupted by the whims of those uncomfortable with the truth.
“And we charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the tradition which they have received of us.” 2 Thessalonians 3:6
God bless you! Great to see you in Cheyenne at Bishop Steven’s ordination.
Archbishop Chaput has a brilliant mind.
God bless you archbishop for your message that affirms my experience and ministry. I shared the same belief with our brothers at our workshop. The Holy Spirit is grace and guiding you to lead us in our spiritual warfare against the malignant one.
“He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world.” Msgr Ralph