When the Pennsylvania grand jury issued its report last August chronicling the sexual abuse cases in six Pennsylvania dioceses, everybody thought they knew the whole story. After all, this was a grand jury, and the attorney general of Pennsylvania was presenting its 1,356-page report to the world as evidence of a grand conspiracy by the leaders of the Catholic Church in his state to cover up abuse allegations and ignore victims.
Everybody knew that the church hadn’t changed its spots. And the crushing weight of all those pages and 301 priests and church workers and 1,000 victims was enough to throw Catholics into despair and light fires under other ambitious attorneys general who wanted to do similar investigations.
Most people, even journalists, never read the full report. The truth is that short-staffed, working on deadline and having to do social media as well as writing traditional stories, journalists rarely have the time to delve deeply into a document like this. And after all, “everybody knew” this was the real story anyway.
One journalist did take the time to look, however. Peter Steinfels, a former editor at Commonweal, a Catholic magazine, and a former religion writer for The New York Times, said his original impulse was simply to learn more about the report, the conclusions of which he found as appalling as everybody else.
In his desire to learn more, he started closely examining the report’s allegations. What he found disturbed him enough to publish a 12,000-word analysis in Commonweal that was sharply critical of the report’s assertion that “priests were raping little boys and girls, and the men of God who were responsible for them not only did nothing; they hid it all.”
“This ugly, indiscriminate and inflammatory charge, unsubstantiated by the report’s own evidence, to say nothing of the evidence the report ignores, is truly unworthy of a judicial body responsible for impartial justice,” Steinfels wrote.
Steinfels’ original article can be found Commonweal magazine and a summary of his findings as well as an interview with the author can be found here.
For Steinfels, as for the church itself, the goal is not to “acquit the Catholic hierarchy of all sins, past or present.” His goal, he wrote, “is to restore some fact-based reality to the instant mythology that the Pennsylvania report has created.”
I call attention to Steinfels’ report not because it exonerates the church. He takes a nuanced and critical view of both abusers and those who had authority over them, and his heart is first and foremost with the victims of these crimes.
I call attention to it because Steinfels’ investigation of the investigation is a model of what good journalism can do and what good Catholic journalism can do. A well-educated, well-trained Catholic journalist writing for a Catholic magazine exposed the serious flaws in a report that “everybody knew” to be true.
Some people want Catholic journalism to simply be propaganda for the defense. Some people don’t see any value in Catholic journalism. They want church communication efforts to be inspirational or provide social media sound bites. But there is still a need, a crying need, for professional journalism that allows the voices of the church to be heard, that models both a love for the church and a dedication to truth.
Only journalism of honesty and substance will be trusted in these dark times. And in an age when trust — of institutions and of authorities of any sort — is in short supply, Catholic journalism can play an indispensable role in recovering this trust.
This month is Catholic Press Month. Subscribe. Read. Share.
Erlandson, director and editor-in-chief of Catholic News Service, can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Join the CatholicPhilly.com family
CatholicPhilly.com works to strengthen the connections between people, families and communities every day by delivering the news people need to know about the Catholic Church, especially in the Philadelphia region, and the world in which we live.
By your donation in any amount, you and hundreds of other people become part of our mission to inform, form in the Catholic faith and inspire the thousands of readers who visit every month.
Here is how you can help:
- A $100 gift allows us to present award-winning photos of Catholic life in our neighborhoods.
- A $50 gift enables us to cover a news event in a local parish, school or Catholic institution.
- A $20 gift lets us obtain solid faith formation resources that can deepen your spirituality and knowledge of the faith.
- A small, automated monthly donation means you can support us continually and easily.
Won't you consider making a gift today?
Please join in the church's vital mission of communications by offering a gift in whatever amount that you can ― a single gift of $40, $50, $100, or more, or a monthly donation. Your gift will strengthen the fabric of our entire Catholic community and sustain CatholicPhilly.com as your trusted news source. Thank you in advance!
Make your donation by credit card here:
Or make your donation by check:
222 N. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
PREVIOUS: Let the elderly teach us a ‘sense of eternity’
NEXT: Seven saints of February show the high cost of love
Within the past two weeks, Greg Erlandson’s commentary is the third article to have been presented in CatholicPhilly.com on the allegedly ground-breaking work of Peter Steinfels regarding the outrageous misrepresentations in the Pennsylvania grand jury report compiled by Attorney General Josh Shapiro. And let me be clear; this is not an attempt to refute anything in any of these three articles. Rather, the intent is to point out that the beginnings of this expose were already suspected and undertaken by Catholic League CEO Bill Donohue as early as March 15, 2016. (See: http://www.catholicleague.org/moral-panic-grips-pennsylvania/). Further, an extensive preview of the report (see: http://www.catholicleague.org/pennsylvania-grand-jury-report-debunked-3/) was published on the Catholic League website on August 16, 2018, in which Donohue begins, “Unlike most commentators and reporters, I have read most of the Pennsylvania grand jury report. The purpose of this statement is to debunk many of the myths, and indeed lies, that mar the report and/or interpretations of it.”
Greg Erlandson laments that “Most people, even journalists, never read the full report. The truth is that short-staffed, working on deadline and having to do social media as well as writing traditional stories, journalists rarely have the time to delve deeply into a document like this. And after all, “everybody knew” this was the real story anyway.” It seems to be the case that neither Erlandson nor George Weigel nor Peter Steinfels (nor Dennis Sadowski, who wrote the first article about Peter Steinfels) have heard of the Catholic League or, possibly, do not consider Bill Donohue to be a journalist. Yet the latter dug into the actual text of the grand jury report as soon as it was available and produced an incisive report of the “myths” and “facts” about which none of the above journalists managed to avail themselves. Donohue’s report and an abundant amount of related material is available on the Catholic League website.
It is so disappointing to imagine that being “short-staffed, working on deadline,” and what-not should have kept readers of the most popular Catholic journals from knowing that a grand-standing AG was enhancing his career by dragging the names of many of Pennsylvania’s innocent bishops and priests through the mud with the obscene implications of his report.