WASHINGTON — On the campaign trail, Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump recently referenced the increasing violence in Chicago, which reached an infamous milestone this summer: the most violent August the city has seen in 20 years.
Chicago Police Department reported 90 homicides, 384 shooting incidents and 472 shooting victims in August. Trump said in an Aug. 22 interview on Fox News that if police were “much tougher,” the problem could be solved in a week. Others, including the city’s archbishop, have suggested there’s a different way to combat the violence in Chicago and elsewhere.
“There really is no reason why we need these combat weapons on our streets,” said Archbishop Blase J. Cupich of Chicago, speaking in a June interview with Chicago TV station WGN about violence and the availability of certain weapons.
Arguments about violence, guns and which kinds of arms should be available to the public long have been a staple in modern-day presidential elections, and this year it’s no different.
“We uphold the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, a natural inalienable right that predates the Constitution and is secured by the Second Amendment,” says theRepublican Party’s 2016 platform. “We oppose ill-conceived laws that would restrict magazine capacity or ban the sale of the most popular and common modern rifle. We also oppose any effort to deprive individuals of their right to keep and bear arms without due process of law. We condemn frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers and the current administration’s illegal harassment of firearm dealers.”
In addition, the platform says, “We oppose federal licensing or registration of law-abiding gun owners, registration of ammunition, and restoration of the ill-fated Clinton gun ban.”
The Democratic Party says in its 2016 platform: “We will expand and strengthen background checks … revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now enjoy; and keep weapons of war — such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines — off our streets. We will fight back against attempts to make it harder for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to revoke federal licenses from law breaking gun dealers, and ensure guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists, intimate partner abusers, other violent criminals, and those with severe mental health issues.”
Sister Marie Lucey of the Franciscan Action Network in Washington said that from a faith perspective, Christians are called to protect life, and trying to get high-powered weapons that can and have been used to kill many people — and as fast as possible — is a life issue.
“Every life has value. Every life is God’s creation,” she said. “Whether it’s abortion, the death penalty, or a person is a victim of gun violence, these are all precious lives that are taken.”
As a representative of the Franciscan Action Network, she has worked with Faiths United to Prevent Gun Violence, a coalition of faith groups seeking dialogue with legislators to affect national policy related to guns. The group planned a Sept. 25 event asking people to sing a tune about peace during Sunday church services or elsewhere, so that violence related to guns ends. The event is part of The Concert Across America to End Gun Violence, which encourages faith communities to use music as a way to bring attention to the issue of gun violence.
“We are not calling for an end to guns,” Sister Lucey said. “That’s not what we’re about. It’s to prevent gun violence.”
And that involves, she said, enacting universal background checks, preventing gun trafficking and straw purchases, limiting high-capacity magazines, and addressing mental health issues.
In “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship,” the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ quadrennial document released in time for presidential election years to educate Catholics on their responsibilities as citizens, the bishops say they support “reasonable restrictions on access to assault weapons and handguns.”
In addition, the bishops said in the statement “Responsibility, Rehabilitation and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective on Crime and Criminal Justice,” issued in November 2000, that “as bishops, we support measures that control the sale and use of firearms and make them safer (especially efforts that prevent their unsupervised use by children or anyone other than the owner), and we reiterate our call for sensible regulation of handguns.”
To some like John Snyder, that’s “an unfortunate attitude.” Snyder, a Catholic whose Twitter handle is @Gun Dean Snyder, said guns are necessary to defend innocent lives from acts of terrorism and criminal violence. He runs a group called St. Gabriel Possenti Society, which is proposing Vatican recognition of the saint as the “patron of handgunners and to stress the historical, philosophical and theological bases for the doctrine of legitimate self-defense.” His www.gunsaint.com website features an image of St. Gabriel Possenti with a lizard on the right and a gun on the left.
But to others such as Bishop Kevin J. Farrell, the issue is not about limiting handguns. It’s about giving anyone who will pay access to weapons that have capacity to kill large numbers of people. The former bishop of Dallas wrote in a January 2016 blog that “Congress has unabashedly sold itself to the gun lobby. If there was ever any doubt, its recent action to kill legislation to ban people on the terrorist no-fly list (from acquiring guns) made it obvious. It is absurd that terrorists, criminals, and mentally unbalanced people can freely and openly buy weapons not intended for sport, but designed to kill people. Writers of the Second Amendment envisioned smooth bore muskets and not semi-automatic and automatic weapons of war.”
He continued: “Let us pray that our legislators will see this as a human and not a political concern so that gun violence can be mitigated through appropriate legislation that allows us to live in a safe environment while respecting our Second Amendment rights.”
Legislation related to guns, however, involves some of the most contentious battles in Congress. Inlate June, Democrats in the House of Representatives held a sit-in protesting the lack of action on four bills related to gun legislation proposed after a June 12 mass shooting in Orlando, Florida.
“What frustrates me the most,” Sister Lucey said, “is that we have had mass shooting after mass shooting after mass shooting, and then briefly the country is horrified and says ‘yes, we need to do something,’ and then attention is shifted elsewhere, and we tend to forget.”
But then another mass shooting occurs and there’s more talk but little action and little consensus on what to do, she said.
“After the Newtown (Connecticut) shooting, everybody thought, surely, these little children were killed, surely we were going to do something and we didn’t. And then you ask yourself, when is the next mass shooting going to occur? Because you know it’s going to happen somewhere.”
Join the CatholicPhilly.com family
CatholicPhilly.com works to strengthen the connections between people, families and communities every day by delivering the news people need to know about the Catholic Church, especially in the Philadelphia region, and the world in which we live.
By your donation in any amount, you and hundreds of other people become part of our mission to inform, form in the Catholic faith and inspire the thousands of readers who visit every month.
Here is how you can help:
- A $100 gift allows us to present award-winning photos of Catholic life in our neighborhoods.
- A $50 gift enables us to cover a news event in a local parish, school or Catholic institution.
- A $20 gift lets us obtain solid faith formation resources that can deepen your spirituality and knowledge of the faith.
- A small, automated monthly donation means you can support us continually and easily.
Won't you consider making a gift today?
Please join in the church's vital mission of communications by offering a gift in whatever amount that you can ― a single gift of $40, $50, $100, or more, or a monthly donation. Your gift will strengthen the fabric of our entire Catholic community and sustain CatholicPhilly.com as your trusted news source. Thank you in advance!
Make your donation by credit card here:
Or make your donation by check:
222 N. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
PREVIOUS: MRS gets $1 million-plus grant from Mormons for refugee resettlement
NEXT: Emmylou Harris heads concert series to benefit Jesuit Refugee Service
““There really is no reason why we need these combat weapons on our streets,” said Archbishop Blase J. Cupich of Chicago..” is another example of our clergy and religious saying what is not true. “Combat weapons” are not available to anyone except our military and police agencies. FYI, there is not such weapon as an “assault weapon.”
Equating guns and killing with guns to abortion degrades the depravity of abortion and a society that permits the annual killing of 1 million+ babies for convenience. Since Roe v. Wade , 15.5 million black babies have died by abortion; 354,392 by violent death. Which is the greater offense against humanity, killing by abortion or the gun death?
When our bishops lead thousands of Catholic people to stand in the halls of our legislative bodies demanding NO $$$$ for any abortion provider, when they bring all clergy to Washington in May and June and tell members of Congress they will go back to the churches and tell Catholics it is a grave sin to vote for those who support abortion, when bishops tell leaders who declare they are a Catholic they are excommunicated because they demand abortion funding MAYBE we Catholics will believe our clergy and religious are truly concerned about the sanctity of life.
“The right there specified is that of ‘bearing arms for a lawful purpose’. This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence.” – U.S. v. Cruikshank (1875)
“[T]he Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms.” – D.C. v. Heller (2008)
According to U.S. v. Miller (1939), the right to bear arms that are “in common use” that have “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia”, can “contribute to the common defense”, or are “any part of the ordinary military equipment” is within the ambit of Second Amendment protection.
Despite all of the above, these ninnies insist on enacting an unconstitutional “assault weapons” ban notwithstanding the fact that it is precisely those weapons that are constitutionally protected.
And that position is patently un-American.
Feel free to support passing common sense mandatory criminal control!
If charged with having/using a firearm unlawfully….
No reduced bail, Subject to an automatic dangerousness hearing, No plea bargains, No reduced sentences, No early release from prison, and minimum state sentencing laws for assaults and/or robberies committed with a firearm.
No need for step two.
If you believe jails are overcrowded and think most criminals should receive community service, go for it. But, when a criminal gets to the point of carrying a gun, a different and more serious ball game and mandated rules needed.