Cardinal Marc Ouellet, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, is pictured in a 2014 photo at the Vatican. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
CORNWALL, Ontario (CNS) — Cardinal Marc Ouellet denounced the “alarmist” and “unfaithful” interpretations of the Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation on the family, “Amoris Laetitia.”
The Canadian cardinal, who serves as the Vatican’s prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, told Canadian bishops the document does not signal “changes to doctrine or to sacramental discipline,” but represents a pastoral approach that takes into consideration “the good of the person,” according to his or her circumstances.
“Any alarmist interpretation” that says the document is “a break with tradition,” or a “permissive interpretation that celebrates access to the sacraments” for the divorced and remarried is “unfaithful to the text and to the intentions of the supreme pontiff,” said Cardinal Ouellet.
Speaking Sept. 25 to more than 80 bishops and eparchs attending the annual plenary of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, Cardinal Ouellet said contrasting reactions to the document have been “delighting some, worrying others, leaving none indifferent.”
The former Quebec City cardinal said Chapter 8 of the document is a call for a “new pastoral conversion” that can bring comfort to suffering people. He conceded that although many welcome this approach, others see it as a risk, “a break with the traditional doctrine and discipline” of the Catholic Church. Chapter 8 became the “interpretive key” for the document, making people judge it as either “positive and welcome,” or “ambiguous and risky,” he said.
[hotblock]
“Amoris Laetitia,” the pope’s 2016 apostolic exhortation that followed synods of bishops on the family in 2014 and 2015, “deserves more attention in itself than merely the public debate” around “disputed points,” he said.
Late last year, four cardinals wrote to Pope Francis seeking clarification on several questions related to the document. More recently, a group of 62 priests, theologians and lay Catholics sent the pope a letter that they claim corrects alleged heresies contained in “Amoris Laetitia.”
Pope Francis identified Chapters 4 and 5 as the “center of the document” said Cardinal Ouellet. The document “must be read as a whole” to understand the “limits and extent of the pastoral orientations.” Often, however, criticisms have been removed from their context, he said.
“Amoris Laetitia” seems “especially urgent and needed in Canada” because of a gap between the church’s official teaching and the “lived experience of couples and families,” Cardinal Ouellet said. This gap has widened since the Second Vatican Council due, in part, to the influence of what St. John Paul II called “the culture of death”: unrestricted abortion, euthanasia, contraception, pseudo-marriage of same-sex couples, divorce and assisted suicide.
“We must re-read ‘Amoris Laetitia’ in a spirit of pastoral conversion,” and with “receptivity to papal teaching,” to help cultures that are “far from the faith” experience the “joy of the Gospel that emerges from faith,” he said.
Pastoral conversion is a process that involves accompanying, discerning and integrating weakness in order to reach people in fragile circumstances, he said. Without that conversion, “it is impossible to adopt the appropriate pastoral attitude of welcome, listening, dialogue and mercy,” said the cardinal.
***
Gyapong is national correspondent for Canadian Catholic News.
PREVIOUS: Holy Land Christians frustrated by lack of legal action against vandals
NEXT: Vatican official condemns discrimination against women
The argument is becoming what Jesu’s Himself, what Almighty God has taught us versus a man’s alternative… Bishop Oulet suffering and living in sin require two separate things to address and correct. Relieve the suffering and call those in sin to repentance
Of course Cardinal Ouellet will tow the party line, or else he would sack like the others.
Really? Then the pope should say so himself!
We never had to have bishops interpret papal documents before. Every time you turn around, someone is telling you something different. This tells me that something is fishy.
I agree with you. I read AL. Much of it is beautiful and wise. Until the controversial Chapter 8. There are so many internal contradictions that it’s impossible to tell what it actually MEANS.
Here is the problem in a nutshell. I understand that we must interpret this in continuity with 2,000 years of constant teaching. The truth does not change. BUT, many of my friends are THRILLED that “the Church is FINALLY getting ‘with the times’ and changing her teaching”. They are under the impression that the POPE is changing the Catholic faith, and they’re “OK with that”. (I wonder where they got THAT idea?)
Never actually having taken the faith seriously, they’re kind of glad that now they can “feel good” about being Catholic since now it doesn’t cause them any inconvenience. There are also no more pangs of guilt for NOT being obedient. “Obedience is such a ‘yucky’ word; I like this pope, they say. He lets me do whatever I want!”