VATICAN CITY (CNS) — In October, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith dismissed Roy Bourgeois from the priesthood because of his participation in the invalid ordination of a woman.
Since then, a Jesuit in Wisconsin has had his priestly faculties suspended after he celebrated a liturgy with a woman purporting to be a Catholic priest; and the Redemptorist order has confirmed that one of its members is under Vatican investigation for alleged ambiguities “regarding fundamental areas of Catholic doctrine,” apparently including the question of women’s ordination.
[hotblock]
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that only men can receive holy orders because Jesus chose men as his apostles and the “apostles did the same when they chose collaborators to succeed them in their ministry.” Blessed John Paul II wrote in 1994 that this teaching is definitive and not open to debate among Catholics.
Yet some Catholics persist in asking why, as traditional distinctions between the sexes break down in many areas of society, the Catholic clergy must remain an exclusively male vocation, and what this suggests about the church’s understanding of women’s worth and dignity.
Few are as well qualified to answer such questions as Dominican Father Wojciech Giertych.
As the theologian of the papal household, Father Giertych has the task of reviewing all speeches and texts submitted to Pope Benedict XVI to ensure they are free of doctrinal error. Though his office was not founded until the 13th century, the Dominican claims St. Paul the Apostle, who corrected St. Peter on important questions of church teaching, as his original forerunner. (A copy of Rembrandt’s portrait of St. Paul in prison hangs on a wall in Father Giertych’s apartment in the Apostolic Palace.)
“In theology, we base ourselves not on human expectations, but we base ourselves on the revealed word of God,” the theologian told Catholic News Service. “We are not free to invent the priesthood according to our own customs, according to our own expectations.”
Father Giertych rejects the idea that the all-male priesthood is a relic of obsolete social norms, as if such norms could have been binding on Jesus.
“Christ was courageous with respect to the local social customs, he was not afraid to be countercultural,” Father Giertych said. “He didn’t follow the expectations of the powerful, of Pilate, of Herod. He had his own work, his own mission.”
According to Father Giertych, theologians cannot say why Jesus chose only men as his Apostles, any more than they can explain the purposes of the incarnation or the Eucharist.
“In the mystery of faith, we need to be on our knees toward something that we received,” he said.
Nevertheless, he said, theology can help illuminate the “internal coherence and beauty of the mystery which has been offered to us by God.”
“The son of God became flesh, but became flesh not as sexless humanity but as a male,” Father Giertych said; and since a priest is supposed to serve as an image of Christ, his maleness is essential to that role.
Reflecting on differences between the sexes, Father Giertych suggested other reasons that men are especially suited to the priesthood.
“The mission of the woman in the church is to convince the male that power is not most important in the church, not even sacramental power,” he said. “What is most important is the encounter with the living God through faith and charity.”
Men are more likely to think of God in terms of philosophical definitions and logical syllogisms, he said, a quality valuable for fulfilling a priest’s duty to transmit church teaching.
Although the social and administrative aspects of church life are hardly off-limits to women, Father Giertych said priests love the church in a characteristically “male way” when they show concern “about structures, about the buildings of the church, about the roof of the church which is leaking, about the bishops’ conference, about the concordat between the church and the state.”
Father Giertych acknowledged that a Catholic woman might sincerely believe she is called to the priesthood, but said such a “subjective” belief does not indicate the objective existence of a vocation.
None of which means that women hold an inferior place in the church, he said.
“Every baptized person, both male and female, participates in the priesthood of Christ through the sacrament of baptism, drawing the fruits of the paschal mystery to one’s own soul,” he said. “And maybe in some sense we could say that, in this, women are more apt to draw from the mystery of Christ, by the quality of their prayer life, by the quality of their faith.”
Women are better able than men to perceive the “proximity of God” and enter into a relationship with him, Father Giertych said, pointing to the privileged role played by women in the New Testament.
“Women have a special access to the heart of Jesus,” he said, “in a very vivid way of approaching him, of touching him, of praying with him, of pouring ointment on his head, of kissing his feet.”
“The mission of the woman in the church is to convince the male that power is not most important in the church, not even sacramental power,” he said. “What is most important is the encounter with the living God through faith and charity.”
“So women don’t need the priesthood,” he said, “because their mission is so beautiful in the church anyway.”
This special relationship, the theologian said, is essentially related to Jesus’ maleness.
“I remember once a contemplative nun told me, ‘oh, wouldn’t it be horrible if Jesus were a woman?’ And it dawned on me that, for a woman, the access to Jesus in prayer is easier than for us men, because he’s male,” Father Giertych said. “The relationship of love, of attachment, the spousal relationship to Christ is easier for the woman.”
PREVIOUS: The Pope’s tweets and retweets: Study analyzes @Pontifex traffic
NEXT: Media blitz can help youths find Gospel in digital deluge, speaker says
Our world is changing fast.we are all taking the constitution upside down. freedom of speech you can say or do anything you want no matter who you hurt,( against the commandment love your neighbor) the right to bear arms, any one can get a gun no matter the mental status or the thrill of owning a weapon.( do not covet your neihbors wife do not covet your neighbors goods.) jESUS CAME INTO THIS WORLD TO ENFORCE GODS TEN COMMANDMENTS, IT LASTED OVER TWO THOUSAND YEARS UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF THE pRIESTHOOD.pLEASE DON’T CHANGE NOW OR WE ARE DOOMED.
What a load of baloney. The men at the Vatican seem determined to exclude women, and they spin increasingly desperate arguments to try and defend the indefensible.
They did not have to defend Truth. Today’s feminist just don’t want to accept it. Men can no more have babies than women can be priest in the Catholic Church. Two different roles neither of which is elective. The fact that you can’t accept Truth and Obedience to authority as founded and established by Christ himself does not change either the Truth or the authority. It’s called the reality of the one true faith. It’s called dogma. Can’t change dogma. Church has never changed dogma in 2000 years. It’s not about to start now just because modern feminist women look on every role as a “right” rather than responsibility. Please take the time to read “The Incredible Catholic Mass” published by TAN Books. It is a classic written by Father Martin Van Cochem. It’s the best detailed explanation of the Mass that you will ever read. Bless You.
I fear the Papal Theologian has made an unfortunate comment.
The only thing I can see that would restrict priesthood to the male sex would be the unique ability of the female body to conceive and nurture a new human, the only person who can cooperate with our Creator to bring to life a new person created in His image.
For this reason she should be held in higher esteem.
That’s not the way humans have generally looked at things but, then, when did humans ever tend to see things the way God does?
Not to be unkind but when are our liberal feminist “friends” in the Church going to stop with this nonsense? What do they not understand about “NO” and/or that Christ was a male. All the priests from the order of Melchizedek in the old testament right on through to the new testament are/were male. Period. Evidently, the Word of God has ordained that being male is a job requirement for being a priest. Period! Every Mass and Eucharist are/is a re-presentation of Calvary. Last time I checked everyone still agrees that Christ was a male and that He was physically crucified at Calvary….Not Mary, His Mother. Every Mass is/was/and will be a sacrifice on the altar by a male priest. That “male” priest who is physically visible to us, just like physical presence of the bread/host and chalice/wine just happens to represent the invisible priest who is actuality Christ Himself. Christ is both the REAL priest and the REAL sacrifice. He offers Himself as the only suitable sacrifice to His heavenly Father aka God the Father under the transubstantiation of bread and wine by the Holy Spirit. It’s the Last Supper every time at which Christ Himself was the the Priest. At no time did any women have the role or priest. So please lets just stop the nonsense. It’s Church Dogma which makes sense if one considers it just for a millisecond. It’s Dogma/Doctrine. Can’t change it. Period! Earth to the lady priest wannabes! You are not men even though a lot of you act, walk, talk, look and dress like men. Men you are not! What you “want” and what is possible don’t compute, won’t compute, can’t compute and will NEVER compute. With all due respect? Like enough already. Grow up and start acting like adults and quit undermining the Church. If you can’t accept it..then please have the decency to leave the Church. Thank you.
“Men are more likely to think of God in terms of philosophical definitions and logical syllogisms, he said, a quality valuable for fulfilling a priest’s duty to transmit church teaching”
Wait…so is he saying that women can’t think as analytically or as philosophically as men??? “Father Giertych said priests love the church in a characteristically ‘male way’ when they show concern ‘about structures, about the buildings of the church, about the roof of the church which is leaking, about the bishops’ conference, about the concordat between the church and the state.’”
Women wouldn’t know how to take care of a structure and/or campus??? We wouldn’t know what to do if the roof leaked?? I’ve never really given a lot of time or thought to this debate, I’ve just always viewed it as “it is what it is,’ but if these sweeping generalisations are all they have to give as valid reasons to deny the priesthood to women, I’m not convinced.
Go through the course “Introduction to Theology of the Body” offered through the Church. Within this presentation based on teachings of Blessed John Paul II, are hidden the keys to the call to discipleship for both men and women.
We are both “fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalm 149:14) and called to be the Bride of Christ! This Bride is looking forward to the Wedding Feast of the Lamb at the end times. . .
These three reasons, I agree, don’t hold much water. The reality is that these are the only 3 you choose to put in your post. There are many others that do hold water, such as Christ’s example. The question is not whether women would make a good priest, there is no question, they would. The relevant question at hand is, what is the will of God. God Bless.