AUSTIN, Texas (CNS) — The Catholic bishops of Texas Oct. 10 called for the abolition of the death penalty, denouncing its effects not only on victims and others immediately affected, but also on society.
“Capital punishment vitiates our hearts’ capacity for mercy and love,” the bishops said in a statement released by the Texas Catholic Conference in Austin. “The death penalty not only does not correspond to the common good, it actually does great harm to it.”
The statement, released on the World Day Against the Death Penalty, comes at a time when support of the death penalty among Americans — including Texans — is declining.
[hotblock]
Survey results released Sept. 29 by the Pew Research Center showed that Americans’ support for death penalty is the lowest it has been in more than four decades. It said only 49 percent of Americans currently favor the death penalty for people convicted of murder. That’s a drop from 56 percent who said in March 2015 that they supported it. The new survey shows 42 percent of Americans now oppose the death penalty.
In Texas in 2015, 56 percent of people surveyed said they supported the death penalty for convicted murderers, down from 75 percent in 1993.
The bishops’ statement also served as their annual address to Texas Catholics during Respect Life Month, observed by the U.S. Catholic Church every October.
The month offers Catholics an opportunity to “reflect on the precious gift of life and recommit ourselves to working toward a culture that truly welcomes and protects human life in our society,” the Texas bishops wrote.
“This year we bishops draw particular attention to our consistent call for the abolition of the death penalty in Texas, as we recognize this is undeniably a pro-life issue,” they said.
In their statement, the bishops cited several ways they said carrying out the death penalty inflicts harm:
— Capital punishment “is used disproportionately on the poor, minorities and people with mental disabilities.
— Costs involved in capital punishment cases “are three times” that of cases in which the convicted are sentenced to life imprisonment.
— The “finality of death” does not allow for rehabilitation of prisoners, nor does it provide “consolation for victims’ families.”
— Studies have shown that states have executed innocent people and that crime rates are not affected by a state’s use of the death penalty.
“The death penalty negatively influences our children’s moral formation and our culture as it fails to allow for mercy and redemption,” the bishops said.
[hotblock2]
“Our call to abolish the death penalty is not a call to deny justice,” they wrote. “On the contrary, it is a call to the whole community to recognize that the death penalty does not fulfill justice, nor does it console the inconsolable.”
A news release said the Texas Catholic Conference, which is the bishops’ public policy arm, will be working in the upcoming session of the Texas Legislature to improve the rights of jurors serving in death penalty sentencing cases.
According to Jennifer Carr Allmon, the conference’s executive director, Texas law “is intentionally misleading as it requires judges and attorneys to lie to jurors about the level of unanimity required for a death sentence.”
“While we will continue our efforts to end the use of the death penalty in Texas, this legislation will at least improve the fairness of the current system,” she said in a statement.
Fewer Texas juries are giving death sentences than at any time in the past two decades, the Catholic conference said. Texas’ highest court for criminal cases — the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals — has granted a high number of reprieves over the past two years, it said, because of concerns “about the fairness and accuracy of death penalty convictions.”
Texas has the highest rate of executions of any state. This year, the state will carry out its lowest number of executions since 1996.
PREVIOUS: Aid slowly makes its way to thousands of Haitians displaced by hurricane
NEXT: Cardinal-designate Farrell has ‘deep pastoral roots,’ says USCCB president
The death penalty is permitted in Catholic teaching. Individual Catholics may or may not agree with teaching. It falls the realm of ‘prudential judgement’.
If Catholic bishops want to publicly oppose the death penalty, it would be an excellent teaching moment to illuminate why the Catholic church allows for it, what are issues of prudential judgement, and their opinion. What they are preaching is only their opinion. It is dangerous and borders on a public scandal for them to mislead Catholics on this issue. JPII also opposed the death penalty, but it was never ‘ex cathedra’, a teaching requiring assent.
Why don’t they stick to issues where there is no confusion- abortion, euthanasia, and other life & family teachings? These are big issues in the public square where our wonderful Catholic teaching would be so helpful! It would also help people choose the best candidates, and be informed on this issues when they are being legislated.
Refusing to execute killers is a pronouncement of death for their future victims. This doesnt bother such exalted personages, who feel qualified to judge the hearts of the righteous, straining at a gnat, while swallowing the camel of “mercy” for the vicious.
Catholic Church teaching has always given recourse to the State to carry out the death penalty as a matter of retributive Justice. It is also a lie to claim that the death penalty does not provide for rehabilitation of the criminal.
These bishops are librul social justice warriors trying to remake the Church into their own image.
The death penalty is permitted in Catholic teaching. Individual Catholics may or may not agree with teaching. It falls the realm of ‘prudential judgement’.
If Catholic bishops want to publicly oppose the death penalty, it would be an excellent teaching moment to illuminate why the Catholic church allows for it, what are issues of prudential judgement, and their opinion. What they are preaching is only their opinion. It is dangerous and borders on a public scandal for them to mislead Catholics on this issue. JPII also opposed the death penalty, but it was never ‘ex cathedra’, a teaching requiring assent.
Why don’t they stick to issues where there is no confusion- abortion, euthanasia, and other life & family teachings? These are big issues in the public square where our wonderful Catholic teaching would be so helpful! It would also help people choose the best candidates, and be informed on this issues when they are being legislated.
The simplistic and sentimental line of reasons for a ‘seamless garment’ concerning issues of life that does not insist upon inserting the adjective “INNOCENT” before life inevitably cheapens, jeopardizes, and undermines the very value and nobility of truly innocent life.