WASHINGTON (CNS) — To understand Martin Luther’s impact on the Second Vatican Council and the era that has followed it, one must first understand the context of Luther’s break with the church 500 years ago, according to German theologian Johanna Rahner.
“Don’t skip the Middle Ages,” advised Rahner, a professor of systematic theology at Tubingen University in Germany, who holds the chair of dogmatics, history of dogma and ecumenical theology at the school.
Three issues that arose during Luther’s time and were embraced by Luther and others of the era were what Rahner called “a turn toward a more inward, intensive form of piety,” the growing prominence of the notion of being saved through one’s faith, and a “growing discontent with the ways the church acts as a spiritual mediator,” Rahner said.
“You can imagine” how these issues put growing pressure on the Catholic Church of Luther’s time, she added.
Rahner, who is a member of the Ecumenical Study Group of Protestant and Catholic Theologians, gave the final address of the May 30-June 1 “Luther and the Shaping of the Catholic Tradition” held at The Catholic University of America in Washington.
The issues and the pressures on the Catholic Church as an institution were “epochal,” Rahner suggested. “Even without Luther, you would have seen a different church in the 16th century,” she said.
“The church in the 16th century had been sitting on an ecclesiological powder keg.”
Rahner said Catholic leaders of Luther’s time dealt less with the substance of Luther’s own ecclesiology and theology than his challenge to papal authority. Cardinal Thomas Cajetan, who was sent to tamp down Luther’s challenge, was “a strict proponent of the papal state,” she added. “Luther’s ecclesiology must be understood” in this context, she noted.
While Luther had labored to reform the Catholic Church itself, by 1520 his emphasis had shifted to forming “an ecclesiastical alternative,” Rahner said, “based on the Gospel, the word of God, in which the main characteristic is the preaching of the Gospel.”
She noted that St. Francis of Assisi’s renunciation of wealth and power in favor of a life of poverty and humility, which took place three centuries before the Reformation, could be seen today as his own dismissal of the institutional church of his time. However, the church came to embrace Francis while it condemned Luther, Rahner added.
Luther held that “only a suffering, persecuted church resembles Christ,” Rahner said.
The church needed to consider the consequences of an “extreme papalism” and a “tribal ecclesiology” which she said it had wrought in differentiating itself from Luther’s positions. The Council of Trent had the opportunity to deal with this issue but opted to see how the situation worked itself out rather than deal with it directly.
This began to change in the 19th century following the anti-clericalism put on display during the French Revolution plus the loss of the Papal States, according to Rahner, leading some leaders within the church to ponder whether its approach had grown “outdated,” but “the Catholic Church of the 19th century had no answer to such questions,” she said.
“It would take more than 400 years for the Roman Catholic Church to recognize” the veracity of Luther’s words. By then, the Vatican II era had grown to full flower. Rahner cited the council documents “Dei Verbum,” on divine revelation, and especially “Lumen Gentium,” on the church, as containing passages that, without mentioning Luther specifically, at least tacitly acknowledged his positions.
This signaled what Rahner called “Luther’s coming home.”
The Catholic Church of today may still be sniffing out “the smell of heresy lingering to possible alternatives,” Rahner said, but Pope Francis’ call — issued in 2013, early in his papacy — for a more synodal model of church less dependent on papal pronouncements recognizes “some need for decentralization.”
Rahner also lauded Pope Francis’ call for the church “to go outside of itself” when he made the distinction “not just the geographical, but the existential peripheries.”
Join the CatholicPhilly.com family
CatholicPhilly.com works to strengthen the connections between people, families and communities every day by delivering the news people need to know about the Catholic Church, especially in the Philadelphia region, and the world in which we live.
By your donation in any amount, you and hundreds of other people become part of our mission to inform, form in the Catholic faith and inspire the thousands of readers who visit every month.
Here is how you can help:
- A $100 gift allows us to present award-winning photos of Catholic life in our neighborhoods.
- A $50 gift enables us to cover a news event in a local parish, school or Catholic institution.
- A $20 gift lets us obtain solid faith formation resources that can deepen your spirituality and knowledge of the faith.
- A small, automated monthly donation means you can support us continually and easily.
Won't you consider making a gift today?
Please join in the church's vital mission of communications by offering a gift in whatever amount that you can ― a single gift of $40, $50, $100, or more, or a monthly donation. Your gift will strengthen the fabric of our entire Catholic community and sustain CatholicPhilly.com as your trusted news source. Thank you in advance!
Make your donation by credit card here:
Or make your donation by check:
222 N. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
PREVIOUS: Trump pushes travel ban to U.S. Supreme Court
NEXT: U.S. Catholics join pope in praying for victims of London attacks
The Word of God gives us the following: “…thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build My Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.* Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Quite specific I would say. Not exactly a synodal model. There is also the fact that no one taught “faith alone” until Luther. It was his new and novel teaching which contradicted James 2:24. .