At the Synod of Bishops on the Family currently underway in Rome, bishops from around the world have come together in small groups to study and report on the working document, or Instrumentum Laboris, which presents the issues under discussion at the synod.
The following is the report of English Circle D (one of the groups) on Section One of the document, dated Oct. 9. Archbishop Chaput is the group’s “relator,” or secretary; the moderator is Cardinal Thomas Collins of Toronto, Canada.
Small group commentaries from the synod on Section One of the Instrumentum Laboris, in their original languages, can be found here.
Those of us taking part in Circle D are grateful to Pope Francis for calling for this synod, and we are honored to be part of the process. We also want to express our gratitude for the hard work embodied in the Instrumentum Laboris (IL). We suggest that the document should start just as we begin any celebration of the Mass — with a kind of Confiteor, putting ourselves in the midst of the failures of the members of the Church, rather than judging them from the outside. We need to acknowledge and ask forgiveness for our own mistakes as pastors, especially those that have undermined family life.
We had two general observations:
First, while various elements of the IL are admirable, we found much of the text to be flawed or inadequate, especially in its theology, clarity, trust in the power of grace, its use of Scripture and its tendency to see the world through overwhelmingly Western eyes. Second, we felt limited in our ability to respond by not knowing clearly who the audience of the document is. In other words, are we writing to the Holy Father, to families of the Church, or to the world?
Most of our group felt the IL should begin with hope rather than failures because a great many people already do successfully live the Gospel’s good news about marriage. Our group expressed concern that readers will simply ignore the document if it begins with a litany of negatives and social problems rather than a biblical vision of joy and confidence in the Word of God regarding the family. The huge cloud of challenges pervading the first section of the text unintentionally creates a sense of pastoral despair.
Several group members felt that Section II should precede Section I. Others supported the current arrangement of the text. A shared concern was that most people won’t read a dense or lengthy document. This makes the IL’s opening section vitally important; it needs to inspire as well as inform. Additionally — recalling the work of Aparecida — members stressed that the focus of the text should be on Jesus, through whom we describe and interpret the world’s present situation. We should always begin with Jesus.
If marriage is a vocation, which we believe it is, we can’t promote vocations by talking first about its problems.
As the Trinity is the source of reality, and because all communities originate in the community of the Trinity, some thought that the Trinity should be the document’s starting point.
Members noted that in his letters, St. Paul would often write a prologue of praise to people whose sins he would then critique. This was a common style in his epistles, and effective.
Our group thought there were a number of elements missing from the text: a serious reflection on gender ideology, more reflection on pastoral care for the differently-abled, the role of fathers and men as well as the role of women, and a deeper treatment of the destructive nature of pornography and other misuses of electronic technology.
Members criticized many of the paragraphs in the first section. Some thought the presentation was chaotic, without inherent logic. Sentences seemed to be tossed together without any organic connection to one another.
Some thought the text worked well because the family today does, in fact, face serious problems. That’s why we’re here at the synod: to deal with those problems; and people who suffer want to see their reality touched by what we say. So it’s important to speak in a way that will draw people’s attention.
Still others thought that the text lacked anything that would attract people. If the document is destined to the general public, they felt that stories from family life, or the lives of the saints along with illustrations, should be included to make the material more compelling. They stressed the need to review the language of the document and ensure that it appeals to both men and women, leaving no one out.
Members worried that the English translation may not be faithful to the official Italian text. Others complained that many of the document’s statements were too general and not specific enough. Still others felt the text had many inaccurate generalizations, was verbose and repetitive.
Members said that some of the sections seemed narrow in scope and excessively inspired by West European and North American concerns, rather than a true presentation of the global situation. Some of the members thought that terms like “developing nations” and “advanced countries” were condescending and inappropriate for a Church document. Others thought that the language of the text was too careful and politically correct, and because of that, the content was unclear and sometimes incoherent. Wonderfully good points were made in some paragraphs, but they were addressed too briefly and in a poorly developed manner. They seemed to be simply pulled together and listed, rather than presented logically.
Overall, members felt that Pope Francis and the people of the Church deserve a better text, one in which ideas are not lost in the confusion. Our group suggests that the text should be turned over to a single editor for clarification and refinement. The current material is obviously the work of a committee. Because of that, it lacks beauty, clarity and force.
Finally, members felt strongly that even in difficult situations, we need to underline the fact that many Christian families serve as a counter-witness to negative trends in the world by the way they faithfully live the Catholic vision of marriage and the family. These families need to be recognized, honored and encouraged by the document.
Thus the first section of the IL text, which is about “observing” the facts, ought to highlight the good as well as the bad and the tragic. Heroic holiness is not a rare ideal and not merely “possible,” but common and lived vigorously in much of the world.
Join the CatholicPhilly.com family
CatholicPhilly.com works to strengthen the connections between people, families and communities every day by delivering the news people need to know about the Catholic Church, especially in the Philadelphia region, and the world in which we live.
By your donation in any amount, you and hundreds of other people become part of our mission to inform, form in the Catholic faith and inspire the thousands of readers who visit every month.
Here is how you can help:
- A $100 gift allows us to present award-winning photos of Catholic life in our neighborhoods.
- A $50 gift enables us to cover a news event in a local parish, school or Catholic institution.
- A $20 gift lets us obtain solid faith formation resources that can deepen your spirituality and knowledge of the faith.
- A small, automated monthly donation means you can support us continually and easily.
Won't you consider making a gift today?
Please join in the church's vital mission of communications by offering a gift in whatever amount that you can ― a single gift of $40, $50, $100, or more, or a monthly donation. Your gift will strengthen the fabric of our entire Catholic community and sustain CatholicPhilly.com as your trusted news source. Thank you in advance!
Make your donation by credit card here:
Or make your donation by check:
222 N. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
PREVIOUS: Syrian archbishops support Russian military intervention in civil war
NEXT: Family life isn’t all bad, synod members say
Reading the first part of the report from afar I came to very much the same conclusions as Chaput’s group – English language-Circle D.
However will Rome Central be listening? I doubt it. That’s why I continue to think it all hype, built up to show that there is discussion and that Rome is listening, when actually its not the case at all. It an expensive and long drawn out meaningless facade. Of course the lay and priestly “experts” that went there feel pleased they contributed. Its something more to add to their CV. But towards what improvement?
The IL for the Extraordinary Synod(ES) listed three areas for discussion: Preaching the Gospel of the Family (the Gospel of Life?), Compassionate care for couples in irregular situations, and Encouraging married couples to be open to children. The first and third of these received little attention in the ES. Are they receiving, or will they be receiving, significant attention in the OS? I ask these questions because contraception, sterilization and abortion are all intrinsically evil and their use is destructive of marriage and the family. Even though all of these practices are objectively serious matter, they are common practice in the culture, including for Catholics. To save the family, the Culture and the Church, the contraceptive culture must be challenged.
I pray for you Bidhop Chaput and the Pope every day. Love Paul
Kudos to Archbishop Chaput for a great critique of the Instrumentum Laboris document which appears to have some significant flaws with its clarity as well as theological accuracy in some sections.
You would think that a document this important and with a year to prepare would be more finished. I fear that the flaws in this document are a reflection of the current state of the Catholic Church. A Church that seems morally confused and unsure of itself. Hopefully I’m wrong but if not then let’s hope Archbishop Chaput and likeminded Synod leaders will through the intercession of the Blessed Mother, lead the Church back to moral clarity and a reaffirmation of Church teachings on marriage, the family, and sinful sexuality such as sodomy.
Thank you Archbishop for your report and leadership in the Synod. You are in our daily prayers as well as the Synod as it is the “hope” for the family.